

| Subject: | Re: Was "How do we remove" now searching the archives again - long |
| From: | Geordie Birch |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:27:58 -0700 |
I just tried this myself and it worked just fine. Only posts from Dennis Haynes were returned. Try it again. Geordie. On 9/13/06, Sam Walters <sam.cooks@verizon.net> wrote: > Last > night, just to test Gmail, I asked Gmail to find posts in my limited > inbox from Dennis Haynes and it found a post where his name was in the > body and was sent by someone else. So the engine didn't do what it was > told to do, a limited search of senders' names and email addresses, but > rather searched the body of all the messages. This is a serious flaw > which weakens its functionality in the long run when the database is > large. If you can't control the search, you will not get what you want > and will get too much which is the big problem with Google. > This would, > for example give me any post which mentioned the Haynes manual, which I > didn't want. So, Gmail doesn't have a capability that it seems to have > from the template for the advanced search terms. What if a username had > "brake" in it and I would get back every post that contained "brake" > instead on only those that had brake in the user name, when I knew that > this user posted some great posts on brake repairs several years ago. I > would have way too much garbage that the search engine should have been > able to discard. > I often use the sender's name when I know that a person has written on a > topic in a detailed knowledgeable way in the past. Why read dozen or > hundreds of emails when the right answer will definitely be found in one > person's posts. So to not have this as a true search controlling > function is a substantial flaw.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »