

| Subject: | Re: [SPAM] Re: vanagon engine conversions vs rebuilt 1.9 waterboxer |
| From: | Marion Lathem |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:46:09 -0500 |
UH... don't mean to be a wet blanket on the Carvair engine...BUT..my folks had a Carvair, it was always broke down. When I got out of the Navy, I went to work in a big mechanic shop. There was this old fellow that worked on Volkswagens, Carvairs, anything basically. One day, he had a Carvair engine torn down, and as I looked at all the parts. he said, don't look like an engine does it..? He then showed me a rod, wrist pin and rod cap of both the Carvair and the Volkswagen. The Volkswagen's endcap to the rod, was almost invisible it was machined so close. The Carvair rod and end cap seam was clearly visible. He told me, pointing to the carvair engine, that's the best Detroit could do, trying to copy a Volkswagen. It clearly is a poor job. We had a police officer that drove a Carvair Spyder, he had his car in every week being worked on... it just could not hold up to whatever he did to it. I want to say Spyder Monza.. but I'm not sure that's correct.? I am new to Volkswagens, but it was really clear to me Volkwagen, clearly had the better machined engines back then. Lyle Lathem Vanagon GL Quinlan, TX
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »