

| Subject: | Re: AFM Data Requested |
| From: | jon |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:00:48 -0800 |
Yup, measuring air flow/resistance is the main part of my research. But, collection the data on the variations in AFMs is why I am wanting this data. These variations are the differences in the AFM types themselves, as well as aging and other things. But, important data points. Conventional wisdom says that a TPS with MAP and IAT is the solution. Those inputs going into a microcontroller that would generate the appropriate output for the stock ECU would solve the problem. But, that's almost as much hardware (and cost) needed to install a Megasquirt. I am trying to find an analog solution. It may not be possible, but it's an interesting project. Jon On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Dennis Haynes wrote: > The modern replacement for the AFM is known as a Mass Air Flow Sensor. > Instead of a flap it uses a heated wire and the circuitry generates a > voltage signal instead of changing the resistance. The main advantage is > reduced inlet restriction and signal relates flow and density, hence, the > term mass. > > What are you really trying to gain? I doubt you can measure the power > increase on a water boxer and once the engine goes into closed loop > operation, the O2 sensor is the real driver for mixture control. In my > experience, I have actually found 3 bad AFM, 2 on the 1.9 and 1 2.1. They > were all opened and tampered with. > > The data you really need is the voltage at various air flows. If you have an > open one and observe it with the engine running, you will find that it never > fully opens nor closes. It will move more with throttle opening than engine > rpm. The data points will need to be collected under varying loads. It may > be easier to replace it with a modified throttle position sensor and > circuit. > > Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > jon > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 5:58 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: AFM Data Requested > > I am deep in my research to find a "modern" replacement for the AFM. You > all out there could help me by measuring resistance of your AFM. > > There are the data points I need (measured with an ohm meter, engine > off, AFM unplugged): > > 1) Engine off resistance (between pins 2 and 4) > 2) Idle resistance (you can probably see a spot on the traces were idle > is) > 3) Full "open" resistance > 4) Half "scale" resistance (move wiper to half way on the tracks) > 5) Vehicle year, type > 6) Engine year, type (be sure I know if it's not a stock engine, etc) > 7) Part number from your AFM (important) > > This is not something for the faint of heart, so you need to know what you > are doing. Here is the procedure: > > 0) Make sure car is off, battery disconneted for good measure > 1) Open up "hood" > 2) Open AFM (black cover is "glued" on) > 3) Unplug AFM > 4) Get ohmeter, and connect to AFM pins 2 and 4(ground). A digital ohmeter > is recommneded. > 5) Measure the above parameters > 6) Put everything back together > 7) Email me the results. ;) > > I will post a spreadsheet with my findings. > > Thanks, > > Jon >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »