

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon vs. Toyota Van |
| From: | Matt Drew |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:02:56 -0600 |
This is meant purely in jest, but why would ANYONE ask a national list of VANAGON LOVERS for an unbiased opinion on this subject? I personally can't imagine that there would be any contest. Vanagon wins by a landslide. ;o) Just my .02 Matt Drew '90 GL "Blackbeard" On 12/19/06, Jeff Lincoln <magikvw@gmail.com> wrote: > > When I lived in Chicago (1995-96) my guitar player had the Toyota version. > I > don't remeber there being any problems with it and we drove it all over. > > That van had and interesting life. It was stolen once but was returned > after > about a week unharmed. There was also some homless person who broke in and > would live in it at night. Never bothered the owner much. > > > On 12/16/06, Geo <geost@verizon.net> wrote: > > > > Any thoughts on the Vanagon vs. Toyota Van? I've been looking into the > > Toyota Van of the same era as the Vanagon. It's a similar unconventional > > design but with the engine under the seats instead of in back. A bit > less > > room but reliability (tho after 20 years I guess it's all a crap shoot) > & > > gas mileage were strong points. I really want to go vege-diesel but > that > > doesn't seem to be a viable option with the Toyota. > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Jeff > 90' Carat (It's Blue, It's Beautiful, It needs a lot of work) > 86' (Soon to be donating organs to the 90') > 85' GL (sidelined but to be resurrected in the near future) >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »