

| Subject: | Re: SA grills available again |
| From: | Jeff Oxroad |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:06:12 EST |
As far as High Beams v. Driving Lights, I would say, you say Tomato and I say Tomato. (You have to pronounce "tomato" differently the first and second time in order for this last sentence to work.) And by that I mean, I may be wrong, but... What is technically the difference in the definition of "high beam" vs "driving light"? If the assumption is that the moniker "driving light" makes the light OK for use in areas with traffic I would say poppycock. I don't see how or where lights in addition to DOT low beams could not negatively impact other drivers. And now, as if I were itching for a fight, I'd add anyone who drives in traffic with anything other than their DOT approved low beams is something of a rube. (Well maybe not "DOT" approved low beams--but low beams at least.) So call them driving lights or high beams or fog lights or whatever (and I agree that these are different animals) but if you're in an urban area with traffic and you're using any of the three you're telegraphing to the world I am a selfish rube. (foggy condition would justify using fog lights--so in this case, not a rube, more of a forward thinking truth seeker.) I've heard the arguments about fog lights having that low wide beam not interfering with other drivers. Poppycock, I say. (that's twice I've said it) First of all the maroons who drive with their fog lights on on a clear night are just the kind of maroons that have adjusted those foggers by smashing a curb so now they blind every on-coming driver and all those in front who have rear view mirrors. Second, even if the lights are adjusted properly, real world conditions like speed bumps, divits, hills, pot holes, convex roadways, etc. offer ample opportunities for those foggers to blind just about anyone in the area. And then there's the high profile vehicles like the EXCURSIONs or many SUVs where the foggers are mounted at the height of a sedans windshield, give or take. In other news, back in the day and back East my family had a Volvo with factory fog lights. In order to pass the state inspection the fog lights had to be wired so they would turn off when the high beams were on. That is to say if you had on the foggers and you clicked on the high beams the fogger would turn off. I don't know if this is still the law anywhere. I will add in California, which is a state without a plan and in the few places where it has a plan it is a bad one, there is no state safety inspection required for vehicles. Your vehicle must pass a smog test, but no one will ever check your brakes or light adjustment etc. As a result I would say at least 25% of the vehicles in this area have headlights that are annoyingly and dangerously out of alignment. Makes me wonder about the state of the brakes. I guess I got off track. But is there some technical difference between driving lights v. high beams? Oh, and my response was to FRONTLEFTSPEAKER's post. Kim's message hadn't posted yet at that time. I hope that clears something up, or starts something up. ;) Best, Jeff 83.5 Westy LA,CA In a message dated 12/19/2006 9:59:32 PM Pacific Standard Time, crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM writes: Jeff, why don't you read Chris' first post again. He clearly describes the small inner lights as not high beams. They are and this is what Kim is referring to. :)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »