

| Subject: | Re: RPM?MPH |
| From: | Allen Hill |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:06:50 -0600 |
FWIW, I have always figured that due to the automatic vs. standard trans that the auto trans would need higher rpms for any given speed due to slipping in the torque converter and transmission. Route 66 Rider! Ramon Hill Live Long and Be Free ======================= -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Geza Polony Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 8:20 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: RPM?MPH That's a higher speed than my '84--at 4,000 rpm I'm reading 60 or close to it. The relationship between rpm and speed should be rock-solid unless something's slipping--either your clutch or your back tires, as on gravel. How old is your clutch plate? Vanagon speedo's are almost always optimistic. The Bentley says 8% higher than real speed is acceptable up to Dec. '84 IIRC, slightly less thereafter. Glad they weren't making moon rockets. Geza On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:28:31 -0500, Mike Stainbrook <mike90260@PEOPLEPC.COM> wrote: >HI All-silly question time:my late 85,with 4 speed stick,at indicated >3500 RPM,I get speedo reading of 62 MPH. is this about right?-is >freeway average,I get a little better down hill,little less up >hill..reason for asking is that the box seems to be a bit slower in traffic-clutch wear? >thanks Mike
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »