

| Subject: | Re: RPM?MPH |
| From: | Mike Miller |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:58:08 -0800 |
I think most automatics lock up everything once they're in top gear. On 1/11/07 2:06 AM, "Allen Hill" <route66rider@KNOLOGY.NET> wrote: > FWIW, I have always figured that due to the automatic vs. standard trans > that the auto trans would need higher rpms for any given speed due to > slipping in the torque converter and transmission. > > Route 66 Rider! > Ramon Hill > Live Long and Be Free > ======================= > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Geza Polony > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 8:20 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: RPM?MPH > > That's a higher speed than my '84--at 4,000 rpm I'm reading 60 or close to > it. > > The relationship between rpm and speed should be rock-solid unless > something's slipping--either your clutch or your back tires, as on gravel. > How old is your clutch plate? > > Vanagon speedo's are almost always optimistic. The Bentley says 8% higher > than real speed is acceptable up to Dec. '84 IIRC, slightly less thereafter. > Glad they weren't making moon rockets. > > Geza > > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:28:31 -0500, Mike Stainbrook <mike90260@PEOPLEPC.COM> > wrote: > >> HI All-silly question time:my late 85,with 4 speed stick,at indicated >> 3500 RPM,I get speedo reading of 62 MPH. is this about right?-is >> freeway average,I get a little better down hill,little less up >> hill..reason for asking is that the box seems to be a bit slower in > traffic-clutch wear? >> thanks Mike > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »