

| Subject: | Re: Moral question--no Bob-related content |
| From: | John Bange |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:39:43 -0800 |
> > He put in the time, so he should be paid. I didn't get the problem fixed, > so > he shouldn't be paid. What's the answer? As a technical service person myself, this is how I look at it: I am hired to perform a task. I generally bill hourly for the time it takes to complete that task, under the presumption that I am competent to do the job and won't be billing for time spent scratching my head. I have had cases where a job has taken me 1 or 2 hours longer than it should have because I missed something obvious and critical. I never bill for those 1 or 2 hours, because the client is paying for my expertise, not my stupidity. In a case where I can't solve the problem, I will either walk away without billing a dime (if I'm totally stumped), or bill for perhaps an hour or two (if I am able to tell the client WHY I can't fix it, and maybe tell them who CAN). In short, it's not the time alone that's worth anything, it's the time spent providing you with a valuable service. Troubleshooting that ends with "I dunno" isn't worth squat. The mechanic and HVAC guys are jerks to ask you to pay full boat for fruitless troubleshooting. If they want to be paid hourly without regard to performance, then they need to go work in a factory, or state government, or something. -- John Bange '90 Vanagon - "Geldsauger" "Staubkess bolt? I have one of those?"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »