

| Subject: | Re: Moral question |
| From: | John Rodgers |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:57:27 -0600 |
Always a good story! Only I heard it as something more critical than a heat valve - What would not work was the toilet in a boarding house. Had everybody backed up. A single smack with a rawhide mallet brought relief to everyone. Bill was similar. Regards, John Rodgers 88 GL Driver Bj�rn Ratjen wrote: > That reminds me of a story: > > Some time ago there was a big apartment complex that had some > recurring heating problems. The steam heating system would work for a > while and then stop again. Many technicians were called in and many > parts were replaced however the system would stall again. At some > point it came to a complete stop. A complete replacement was discussed > as the temperatures dropped, however, the company who owned the > buildings hesitated due to the anticipated cost. It was clear though > that something needed to be done soon. > > One of technicians who had worked on the system suggested to ask an > old and very experienced installer and technician who had actually > years ago taken him on as an apprentice. It was agreed that they > should contact the old man before serious replacements of equipment > and plumbing were to take place. The old man came, carefully listened > to the noises in the system and followed some pipes. Then he took out > a small hammer and tapped a valve. With hissing and groaning the > system began to work again. Everyone was grateful and full of > admiration as the whole procedure had barely taken 15 minutes. > > Then the bill came for $310. The manager of the buildings was not > amused as the old gentleman had only been there for a very short time > and asked for an itemized invoice. > > It read: > tapping valve $10 > knowing where to tap $300 > > Bj�rn > > P.S. Now read this story form a customer or service provider perspective. > > > At 02:16 PM 16/01/2007, you wrote: >> Ok, in a question with no bearing on the Boston Bob scandal of late, >> here's >> a situation I've been in many times and have yet to find an answer for. >> >> You hire a tradesperson by the hour to fix a problem. He or she puts >> in the >> hours, but does not fix the problem. Do you pay? >> >> Sounds simple, but it rarely is. Case #1: I took a '93 Saab to a >> reputable >> local mech to have the vacuum cruise control fixed, something which I >> now >> know is by definition impossible. After five hours of labor at something >> like $85 per hour, the mech came back with a kind of sheepish look >> and said >> he just couldn't figure it out. >> >> He put in the time, so he should be paid. I didn't get the problem >> fixed, so >> he shouldn't be paid. What's the answer? >> >> Case #2: an HVAC installer put in a $4,500 water heater in one of our >> buildings, but could not get it to start. After countless hours on >> the phone >> with the manufacturer and other information sources, we had our >> maintenance >> guy reverse the polarity on the AC supply. Five minutes and it worked >> fine. >> We paid the installer around $2K for his labor but balked at the >> second bill >> he sent for his (worthless) hours troubleshooting. >> >> He put in the hours. Should he be paid? Should we, for the damage to our >> company's reputation from irate tenants without hot water? For the >> hours we >> put in? >> >> I think this happens all the time, especially in diagnostic situations >> involving things like intermittent electrical problems. >> >> In Vanagons. >> >> Any mechanics out there care to comment? >> >> Geza > > Bj�rn Ratjen, Ph.D. > Cobble Hill, B.C. > phone/fax (250) 743-7575 >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »