

| Subject: | Re: Warning! Do not use... |
| From: | John Rodgers |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:04:51 -0600 |
Those look like the ones. John Rodgers 88 GL Driver Jeffrey Schwaia wrote: > John, > > You mean something like this: > > http://www.vanagonparts.com/temp/nuts.jpg > > Exhaust Lock Nut (VW #: 059 129 601) > > About $0.25/each > > For some reason, very few mechanics seem to use them. > > Cheers, > > Jeff > www.vanagonparts.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM]On Behalf > Of John Rodgers > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 1:59 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Warning! Do not use... > > > Geza Polony wrote: > >> stainless steel bolts on your muffler/catalytic converter. >> >> The more experienced among us know this already. I thought I'd beat the >> corrosion problem by using M8 stainless bolts and nuts for my new Bus >> > Depot > >> cat and muffler. Once they heat up, there's no way to loosen them. I don't >> know what happens to the steel, but it sure isn't any labor saver. The >> > heads > >> just break of when you crank them. So much for good intentions. >> >> >> >> > This may not relate, but on airplanes with piston engines, specially > treated steel nuts are sometime used on exhaust studs OR special brass > nuts are used. I think the nuts were more bronze than brass. In my > experience the brass nuts were the nuts of choice, because experience > taught that even the specially treated steel nuts could give trouble. > Anti-seize was not used with brass nuts because they would be subject to > backing off due to vibration. But the friction of the brass on the steel > was sufficient to hold them in place, yet the brass was soft enough that > when it came time to remove them they would turn loose of the stud they > were mounted on. Sometime brass was left on the stud, but the stud would > not be damaged. Far better to discard a brass nut, and clean the stud > threads, than try to replace an exhaust stud - especially with the > cylinder still on the engine and the engine in that airplane. It might > be worth trying them on the WBX unless someone knows a specific reason > why not to. > > Regards, > > John Rodgers > 88 GL Driver > > > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »