For a while there I was getting an automated message from Gerry that would
give the list population and the last time I got it we had around 856, so if
Joel is correct we've gained a little weight in the last nine months or so-
at any rate that figure would seem to be in the ballpark. Guess it's better
to have a little wisdom in your ass than none at all, eh?

Cya,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Maggie Dew" <wildebus@GMAIL.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: how many on this list?

> Since I get the digest form of the list e-mail, I didn't see Unca Joel's
> report until after I sent the "wise**es" message.  So, I guess I'd have to
> say no - I would've been disappointed to get seven serious answers and
> only
> one wise**.  But I know this group, and I felt secure in the knowledge
> that
> they would respond as expected.
>
> You're a great group - in spite of yourselves.
>
> Maggie
>
>
> On 1/28/07, Mike Collum <collum@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> You might notice that my sort of "Wise" remark came after you got the
>> 905 answer.  Would you have felt better with 7 "905s" and one that was
>> wise?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> Maggie Dew wrote:
>> > So far:  eight wisea**es and one helpful responder.  I will e-mail Jim
>> A.
>> > and see what he says.  I might share the answer . . . but, then again I
>> > might not.
>> >
>> > ;>P
>> >
>> > Maggie
>> >
>>