

| Subject: | Re: CSI: Vanagon...Smog results! |
| From: | Old Volks Home |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:05:47 -0800 |
Just a note: The Green Box Idle Stabilizer is for 80-85 California Models, 83.5-84Federal Models, 251 906 083 The Black & sometimes Grey Box is for 85 Federal Models, 321 906 083 And as Dennis says, not that they're worth anything - they're usually more trouble than they're worth ;-) -- Jim Thompson 84 GL 1.9 "Gloria" 84 Westfalia 2.1 "Ole Putt" 73 K Ghia Coupe "Denise" 72 411 Station Wagon "Pug" oldvolkshome@gmail.com http://www.oldvolkshome.com *********************************** On 2/5/07, Dennis Haynes <dhaynes@optonline.net> wrote: > > Below 1,000 rpm, air quantity and turbulence is too low to promote fuel > mix. That is the main reason the idle ignition timing is designed to be so > low. Advance the timing, and the fuel and air quantity has to be further > reduced to maintain a low idle speed. As there is no after air injection > reaction system, all combustion has to be in the engine or the Cat. Also, > the proper spec is 850-950 rpm. Not 650. There are two versions of the idle > stabilizer, Green and Black. I forget which but one of them does not do > anything until the idle approaches 650. Virtually use less. The other one > starts to advance the timing as the idle goes below 750. Still not much > help. > > Dennis > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: William Greenamyer > Date: Monday, February 5, 2007 8:22 am > Subject: Re: CSI: Vanagon...Smog results! > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > > Below you say to set the idle RPM to 950-1000. That happens to > > be where my > > van (84GL) passes. It does not pass at Bentley value of 650RPM. > > What is > > happening at 950-1000 that is not happening at 650RPM? Is it > > just the heat > > of the CAT or is there something else we should be considering? > > > > William > > > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:41:34 -0500, Dennis Haynes > > wrote: > > > > >The crossover pipe on top of a giveaway. 1.9. The single pulley > > indicates it > > >most likely was a late '83 with the extremely early cooling > > system and it > > >may even have that odd ball 190 mm clutch and flywheel. > > > > > >Now for your emissions failure results. > > > > > >Your test is basically an idle speed and 2,500 rpm test. You > > failure was > > >both HC and O2. From a diagnostics point of view this is > > extremely valuable. > > >You r test results provide the justification for these testing > > programs. You > > >are a gross polluter putting out fumes like a Model T or a bad > > lawnmower.> > > >As a recap for the group, the test limits are 1.2% CO and 220 > > ppm HC. These > > >are typical limits and all cat equipped vehicles should reach > > it, even > > >without a working cat. For information, the Dyno tests (IM 240) > > is used to > > >put the drive train under a sustained load to test for NOx > > production. This > > >tests the 3-way part of the cat, (CO, HC, NOx) and for engines > > so equipped, > > >the EGR function. Changes in ignition timing, gearing, > > compression ratios, > > >etc have adverse effects on NOx. > > > > > >Anyway, your results were 9.99% CO, 1700 ppm HC at idle and > > 8.63% CO and 255 > > >ppm HC at 2,500 rpm. The O2% was .2 at 2,500 and 5.6 at idle. > > > > > >Normal atmosphere O2 is at least 19.5% these readings tell me > > the thing is > > >running real rich. There is obviously no O2 sensor control. The > > fact that > > >the HC drops at 2,500 rpm tells me there may also be an > > ignition, timing or > > >valve problem. > > > > > >First thing to do is test the O2 sensor. Put meter on it. > > Measure between > > >the sensor lead and a good chassis ground. With things cold, > > when you first > > >turn on the ignition, you should see ~.6 volts. The is the > > leakage or bias > > >voltage on the ECU amplifier input. A cold sensor is an open > > circuit so you > > >will see that. Now start the engine. As the sensor warms, you > > may see the > > >voltage drop but it should soon increase. Since you are so > > rich, you should > > >see close to 1.0 volt or maybe more. If not, sensor is shot. > > > > > >Next, after we know we have a good sensor, remove the cover > > from the AFM. > > >Disconnect the sensor from the ECU and connect it to the meter. > > Start engine > > >and watch voltage on sensor after it warms up. While engine is > > running,>gently turn AFM wiper opposite the direction the > > airflow is pushing it. The > > >engine should lean out and the sensor voltage should drop. > > Using the plastic > > >wheel, tighten return spring to get the sensor reading to > > around .5 volt. > > >Rev the engine and see if you can get it close to that voltage > > across the > > >range. The idle bypass screw can help get the idle speed tuned > > if needed. I > > >usually just set it 2 turns open and a properly functioning > > system will take > > >it from there. Re-connect the sensor to the ECU. You should be > > able to see > > >the sensor reading vary from .2 to.8 volts. You now have O2 > > sensor control. > > >If the throttle switch is working right, you can rev the engine > > to say 1,800 > > >rpm, let go of the throttle, and see the O2 reading go to "0" > > for a moment > > >as the engine slows down. This is due to the fuel shut off when > > the engine > > >is above 1,300 rpm and the throttle is closed. Now, when the > > fuel is > > >resumed, the O2 sensor is ignored for 30 crank revolutions. > > This is why the > > >base mixture setting is critical. If the mixture is too rich > > without the O2 > > >control, the engine will creep above the cut off speed, fuel is > > shut off, > > >the speed drops, and the cycle will continue. This is that > > famed Digi-jet > > >idle surge. > > > > > >For the basic settings, make sure the distributor vacuum > > advance and retard > > >are both working. Set the timing at the correct setting, over > > advanced will > > >increase HC at idle. Set warm idle high at 950-1,000 rpm. Makes > > a big > > >difference. Make sure the auxiliary air regulator is working, > > getting 12 > > >volts and closing quickly. If the basics are set correctly, you > > should no > > >problem passing those limits. > > > > > >Dennis >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »