But if it weren't for the repetition, Dennis would hardly ever post.
Are you trying to silence him?

:D

On Feb 12, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Michael Elliott wrote:

> Repetition be damned! This is an excellent example of the
> usefulness of
> a Vanagon wiki -- Dennis would only need to write one (1) article on
> this subject and post it. As new information comes in, he or other
> writers amend and expand it. Someone comes along with the battery
> question, s/he gets pointed to it. If the article doesn't address
> their
> question, and it's a good question, then the answer goes into the
> article.
>