

| Subject: | Re: Statistical Question (LVC) |
| From: | Aaron Pearson |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:52:40 -0600 |
standard deviation is insufficient for perverted statisticians. aaron '87 syncro westy ej22 >From: Tom Buese <tombuese@COMCAST.NET> >Reply-To: Tom Buese <tombuese@COMCAST.NET> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: Statistical Question (LVC) >Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:41:37 -0700 > >On Feb 12, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Aristotle Sagan wrote: > >>Iffum you were an electrical engineer, you would know the answer is >>1.141. >>If that doesn't work, multiply it by the square root of -1. There >>are only >>two answers in EE as far I can see. Now to normalize that function, >>seek >>professional help. >> >> >> >>tim in san jose (a computer engineer) >> >>On 2/12/07, Loren Busch <starwagen@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>RE: Statistics Problem >>>The answer is 42. If that's a statistical answer, the Standard >>>Deviation >>>is >>>4.2...... > >Is the std. dev. always 10%? grin > >My vanagon always operates w/in the standard deviation? > >Tom B.- +-3-4% _________________________________________________________________ FREE online classifieds from Windows Live Expo � buy and sell with people you know http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwex0010000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://expo.live.com?s_cid=Hotmail_tagline_12/06
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »