LOL

On 2/12/07 3:52 PM, "Aaron Pearson" <aarondpearson@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:

> standard deviation is insufficient for perverted statisticians.
> 
> aaron
> '87 syncro westy ej22
> 
> 
>> From: Tom Buese <tombuese@COMCAST.NET>
>> Reply-To: Tom Buese <tombuese@COMCAST.NET>
>> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
>> Subject: Re: Statistical Question (LVC)
>> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:41:37 -0700
>> 
>> On Feb 12, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Aristotle Sagan wrote:
>> 
>>> Iffum you were an electrical engineer, you would know the answer is
>>> 1.141.
>>> If that doesn't work, multiply it by the square root of -1. There
>>> are only
>>> two answers in EE as far I can see. Now to normalize that function,
>>> seek
>>> professional help.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> tim in san jose (a computer engineer)
>>> 
>>> On 2/12/07, Loren Busch <starwagen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> RE: Statistics Problem
>>>> The answer is 42.  If that's a statistical answer, the Standard
>>>> Deviation
>>>> is
>>>> 4.2......
>> 
>> Is the std. dev. always 10%?  grin
>> 
>> My vanagon always operates w/in the standard deviation?
>> 
>> Tom B.- +-3-4%
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> FREE online classifieds from Windows Live Expo � buy and sell with people
> you know
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwex0010000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://expo.
> live.com?s_cid=Hotmail_tagline_12/06