Date:    Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:41:11 -0800
From:    John Bange <jbange@GMAIL.COM>

> Phil wrote:
>
> The type of Cooler I settled on was a fluid to fluid type.
> Plumbs into the Van's cooling system.
> On the return line from the Radiator, between the Thermostat-Housing
> and the end of the Plastic return-line. Omits two expensive hoses from
> the cooling system and supplies the coolest-coolant to the Cooler!

John wrote:
Yeah, but only when the thermostat is open!
---------

Yes John, I fully agree with you here.
I cannot conceive of a condition where this would be a
problem or issue? Works like a stock cooling system, AFAIK.
If you see a problem or issue please hit me with a soft-blow
hammer to wake me up.... 8-)

Omits having to install another thermostat to the AT cooler
(ATF part) as would be the case with an air-air cooler.

With the engine thermostat closed, both AT & Engine warm up
together, as thermostat opens, they both begin cooling
from the Rad. Same as the stock cooling system but with a twist.

As mentioned, a couple less hoses to blow. The hoses
for the AT equipped Vans are exorbitantly expensive.
The system I plan, omits both these $200 hoses.

The real gain I hope to accomplish with this modification
are under the harsh conditions of crawling up a goat-track on
a hot day, engine revving, Rad Fan on high, temperatures of
both engine and AT climbing. Not a pretty sight when AT
temps are going above 200 F.

In the stock cooling system, the AT receives its coolant
from the outlet of the engine at the coolants hottest point
in the system. Circulates to the AT cooler and returns to
the engine even hotter than before, only to continue cycling
in this fashion. I see this as only adding to the overall
heat gain back at the engine and significantly to the AT.

In my proposed system, the AT receives coolant from the
Rad return line, the coolest part in the cooling system,
short of up front at the outlet from the Radiator.

The stock OEM ATF coolers are good units, work well
but, are not optimum under the condition I describe
above. Will the one I propose to utilize work better?
Hope so and as yet, only my ATF temp gauge knows for
sure. On the stock system it is telling me, things
are getting way-too hot when climbing on a hot day.
At 230-240 F I pull over and rest it awhile. Cools
down to engine temperatures surprisingly fast.

By Spring I hope to have the Aeroquip Cooler installed
and will go climb some hills and see.... Wish me luck.

regards
Phil Z.
Campbell River.