

| Subject: | Re: Global Warming My Vanagon? |
| From: | Tom Buese |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:53:56 -0600 |
What about the ice that is on land? Tom B.-surf's up? On Mar 16, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Kenneth Lewis wrote: > If I remember my physics; ice displaces it's own weight in water; > then it's > melting should NOT cause a rise in water level. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mordo" <helmut.blong@GMAIL.COM> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 5:45 PM > Subject: [VANAGON] Global Warming My Vanagon? > > >> I know this is in jest, but I think it's the other way around. >> Rising sea >> levels mean FEWER beaches, fewer girls in thong bikinis sunning >> themselves. >> >> Those beaches have taken millennia to become beaches. Now, the rising >> temps >> may mean we'll all be wearing thong bikinis just to stay cool but >> I don't >> know that that is such a good thing given our trend toward national >> obesity... >> >> >> >>> For the guys on this list, I don't think you're looking at this >>> global >>> warming business in the right light. Melting polar ice caps mean >>> rising >>> sea levels. Rising sea levels mean more beaches. More beaches >>> mean more >>> girls in thong bikinis sunning themselves. What's not to like about >>> that? >> >> >> >> >> -- >> mordo >> 1990 Carat
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »