

| Subject: | Re: What features from the Vanagon would be necessary in a new vehicle for you to consider it an adequate or improved replacement? was: "Brand new" bus now Vanagon |
| From: | Greg Potts |
| Date: | Sat, 7 Apr 2007 22:41:08 -0400 |
Hi John, Here's my deal-breaking feature: Community support. I don't want to be tied to a single-source for upgrades and upkeep. The main attraction of the VW Vanagon/Baywindow platform for me is the wide range of solutions-providers available. Any vehicle can be modified to fit any spec if you work hard enough at it. Witness the mid-engine V8 vanagons on the salt flats, and the baywindow monster-trucks in Austrailia. But the VW community is something no-one can manufacture. Man... I am SO ready for EveryBus. Happy Trails, Greg Potts 1973/74/77/79 Westfakia "Bob The Tomato www.pottsfamily.ca www.busesofthecorn.com On 7-Apr-07, at 8:48 PM, John Bange wrote: >> If you were going to design a vehicle from the ground up to >> replace the >> Vanagon, keeping in mind gov't requirements and all that, what >> features >> would it have and what would it look like- what are the 'essential' >> Vanagon >> elements? What among those elements should be improved or upgraded >> (how >> and >> why)? >> >> Here's what I'd require to replace my beloved money-sucker Vanagon: > > -Engine in the rear, or maybe up front between the seats, like an 80's > Toyota Van. Just not taking up space in a big, useless nose. > -Decent ground clearance > -High, comfortable seats that fit me at 6'2" > -Rear bench folds into a bed > -Easy to service (I guess that eliminates an engine up front like the > Toyota!) > -Tough as nails, and reliable if maintained properly > -Availability of a Westy-type pop-top > -Big enough so I don't bang my head and elbows all the time > -Not so huge it only gets 11MPG, like my Chevy work van > > What would improve the Vanagon? Air bags, ABS, and all that safety > crap I > suppose. Really the only serious weakness I see in the Vanagon is the > engine. If VW had made a more Subaru-like wasserboxer, it would be > perfect. > But really, the reason I like the Vanagon so much is that its > shortcomings > are so very minor compared to its utility. Lots of little > annoyances like > marginally adequate wiring, dim DOT headlights, stupidly small 14" > wheels, > stiffener-losing plastic or rusting metal coolant pipes, wimpy > front brakes, > even wimpier factory engine; but these are all obstacles that can be > overcome (by throwing lots of money at them, usually). The > satisfaction of > watching giant RV's trying to park in a campground, seeing tent > campers > rubbing their aching backs after sleeping on the ground all night, > making > lumber yard guys' eyes pop out when you slide five sheets of > plywood in the > back--- it makes it all worthwhile. > > Did I mention the engine is in the back, where it belongs? That's very > important. > > -- > John Bange > '90 Vanagon - "Geldsauger"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »