

| Subject: | Re: Engine Conversion marketing survey |
| From: | --------------------- |
| Date: | Tue, 1 May 2007 13:09:33 -0400 |
Will ether of these engine choices be anything other than a 4 cyl.?
Its been known long long ago that 4 cly. are inherently noisy.
JOE. W
John Reddick wrote:
>Hans and myself are thinking about adding to our engine conversion
>line with a lower cost conversion. While we still think the Subaru engine
>is the best fit for the Vanagon, we also understand that it is a bit more
>than many people want to spend on their Vanagon. As rebuilt WBXers get
>more and more expensive to keep running, our conversions are actually
>getting quite a bit more affordable.
> There is a price point where we will stimulate demand. We believe
>that it is 5500-5900 dollars. We would have to sell quite a few to make
>it worth while for us to produce it.
> Our conversion will be based on either a late model GM or Ford base
>engine. It will come with a complete exhaust and shortened oil pan. All
>accessories except AC will be standard. Just like our Subaru conversion,
>it will be extremely complete, with no wire splicing to be done by the
>installer.
> 2wd will either have to accept a little loss of ground clearance, or a
>slightly raised rear engine cover.
> Please pmail me off list to my personal email at SVYOLO@yahoo.com.
>
> John
> East Coast Vanagon
>
>
>
>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »