

| Subject: | Re: vanagon Digest Huffer motor post |
| From: | aatransaxle |
| Date: | Fri, 18 May 2007 19:08:08 -0700 |
I have a few thousand miles on my syncro westy with an old subie turbo unit on a mostly stock wbx'er with no ill effects. Run it about 5 psi of boost and its a happy camper (literally).B.Bob big valve heads and ratio rockers on a fresh rebuild. Some prototype pics of on my web site home page..link at the bottom. Daryl of AA Transaxle (425) 788-4070 aatransaxle.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Hanson" <dhanson@GORGE.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 10:24 AM Subject: Re: vanagon Digest Huffer motor post > Hi Jim > No, not the boxer motor. This may seem like blasphemy, especially here on > the Vanagon List, but from everything I have read > (never owned one myself) the waterboxer seems a pretty weak design all > around. At least that is what I glean from all the rap. > What I was thinking is an inline 4 vw motor, perhaps even the one I > already have in my 84, which is an older 8-valve 1.8liter. I will have to > do some further research, but I've seen mention of aftermarket kits and > parts available for 1.8L Turbo VW factory motors, and I understand the > basic > pieces of the VW inline four haven't been changed much. If the factory > put > out turbos and GTIs using that platform, it may be feasible to bolt on a > supercharger without overstressing the motor beyond reason. Luckily, I > don't live in California, so the C.A.R.B. dweebs are not a concern..(BTW, > why do they go after little guys with small motor conversions there in > Wow-fornia and let Mexican truckers run around spewing black smoke, and > stuff like that? moot question.) > If one were to keep the final power output within reason, it seems to me > like it'd work great. Hold the HP down to about what you get from a 2.5 > liter Subie. Probably the motor weight would be near 3-500lbs less. The > initial conversion is certainly much cheaper and simpler than a Subie > conversion, what with an I-4 being cheap and readily available. > The guys who've stuck em onto vehicles I have seen seem to have no major > issues with engine management. The issues seem to be pretty > basic..Getting > the drive belts and brackets done properly, sizing the pulleys for proper > "pump" speed, etc. > I am going to look into this seriously as I just sold my '72 Beetle and > have about the proper sum of cash sitting around right now from that > transaction...Hmmm The target would be about 150-175hp from a motor that > is > 3-4 hundred lbs lighter than a waterboxer and that's found in every VW > since > the Rabbit... > Don Hanson > >> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:06:17 -0400 >> From: Jim Akiba <> Subject: Re: Huffer motors..Turbo and SC... >> >> Hey Don, >> >> Do you mean supercharge the boxer? Yeah you could do it, but there are >> serious downsides. The big three are that since the boxer is already > prone >> to head gasket sealing problems as most open decks are, forced induction > in >> anything but the lowest of boost levels is asking for trouble. Second > you'd >> have to change the engine management significantly enough to cause the > whole >> project to cost quite a bit of money, and the supercharger itself isn't >> cheap. You'd also have to bring whatever other pieces of the puzzle that > are >> old and worn up to spec, you can't push the limits of an engine if it's > near >> failure already either because it is maxed out by design or state of >> operation because of age, miles, etc. Lastly since the boxer is >> expensive >> to rebuild/replace, the risk financially is huge. If you spent 5k on >> supercharging the setup and pop your engine, are you really willing to > spend >> another 4k for a rebuild to attempt it again? What is the second rebuild >> goes? You're then 13k into it with nothing to show. The risk money-wise >> is >> huge, the *potential* ROI is small. Doable? Sure. Prudent... eh.. >> dunno... >> You're right about the altitude though, in our 3500k mile trip just this >> past month, at altitudes of 6k and above with the supercharged setup we > were >> still pulling good grades at 65-70 if we wanted to push it. >> >> Jim Akiba
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »