

| Subject: | Re: Auto conversion to Manual? |
| From: | neil |
| Date: | Sat, 19 May 2007 10:31:08 -0700 |
What about the difference in fuel efficiency? Is there a pronounced difference? Neil. -- Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia. http://web.mac.com/tubaneil On 5/18/07, Ron LK Johnson <adhocMedia@comcast.net> wrote: > Lots of interesting discussion, but the basic interest was due to a > simple enjoyment of the shift experience and not necessarily > durability. An Auto trans is great in city traffic which is the > mainstay of my driving. But, I do expect to travel on un-paved roads > - not exactly Syncro territory, but definitely beyond a standard > car's capability. The Auto would probably be fine for these very > occasional excursions, but still lacks the satisfying feel of shifting. > > I think the consensus is, yes a conversion is possible (no > infrastructure problems), but a bit difficult to do and probably > involves excessive $$$ unless one had a donor car to work from. Using > a donor and wanting to minimize NET cost, one could do a double > swap... and re-sell the donor to someone who is as set on driving an > Auto as I am on driving a Manual! Of course there is the cost of > labor which for me was much lower 20 years ago though I had plenty of > time to spare... > > thanks again, > ron johnson >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »