Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: Auto conversion to Manual?
From:neil
Date:Sat, 19 May 2007 10:31:08 -0700

What about the difference in fuel efficiency?

Is there a pronounced difference?

Neil.

--
Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia.

http://web.mac.com/tubaneil

On 5/18/07, Ron LK Johnson <adhocMedia@comcast.net> wrote:
> Lots of interesting discussion, but the basic interest was due to a
> simple enjoyment of the shift experience and not necessarily
> durability. An Auto trans is great in city traffic which is the
> mainstay of my driving. But, I do expect to travel on un-paved roads
> - not exactly Syncro territory, but  definitely beyond a standard
> car's capability. The Auto would probably be fine for these very
> occasional excursions, but still lacks the satisfying feel of shifting.
>
> I think the consensus is, yes a conversion is possible (no
> infrastructure problems), but a bit difficult to do and probably
> involves excessive $$$ unless one had a donor car to work from. Using
> a donor and wanting to minimize NET cost, one could do a double
> swap... and re-sell the donor to someone who is as set on driving an
> Auto as I am on driving a Manual! Of course there is the cost of
> labor which for me was much lower 20 years ago though I had plenty of
> time to spare...
>
> thanks again,
> ron johnson
>