

| Subject: | Re: 102mph - Turbo vs. 6-cylinder |
| From: | Pensioner |
| Date: | Tue, 22 May 2007 15:48:38 -0700 |
It's not peak torque we brick drivers are seeking, it's a broad range of usable torque. If you look at the torque vs rpm curves for most turbocharged 1.8/2.5 litre motors you will notice the peakiness of the curve. If you look at the SVX torque curve it shows >180lbs-ft from 1500RPM to above 6000RPM with a peak around 235/240lbs-ft at around 4400RPM. Smooth and flattish. Just what you need for a 5000lb truck. Now if we had a constant 200lbs-ft from 1000 to 15000 rpm we could do with a two speed transmission. (ref Jim Hall, Chaparral MK2). The only valid reason to have multiple speed transmissions is to allow one to remain within the usable torque range of the powerplant. Or since the Corvette NEEDS a six speed to enhance one's virility and reduce one's guilt, a second reason arises, desire or because you WANT one. And now that you HAVE one at exhorbitant financial and energy cost, you're mad as hell because you're stuck in 20mph traffic with your 50000USD/600BHP/160MPH/13MPG@3.75 per gallon enhanced virility blingy thingy. If you want to ride the bullet train, you gotta buy the ticket. De gustibus non disputandum est. p
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »