

| Subject: | Re: New Engine Conversion |
| From: | Jonce Fancher |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:27:56 -0400 |
Thats OK I still like CAB Forward Design from Chysler in the 80s. Ive got a 56 single cab and that IS cab forward. If any more forward I would be sitting on the front bumper. C-ya Jonce >Once again GM is full of BS. Chrysler had a lot of this technology >in the Neon., (witch by the way they just quit making) Other car >munfufactures >are way ahead of GM years ago. Now they advertize this as if its >theire own. > Joe. W >neil wrote: >> On 6/21/07, John Reddick <SVYOLO@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> SNIP >> >>> After evaluating other engines based on fitment, performance, >>> availability, and cost, we have decided on using GM's Ecotec line of >>> engines >>> as the basis for this new conversion. The only close competitor was the >>> Ford Zetec, but the Ecotec line had far more factory engine choices >>> (142, >>> 172, 205, 265hp) versions and NO TIMING BELT. >> >> >> SNIP >> >> >> >> But it has a timing chain? >> >> (small PDF download) >> >> http://www.gmtunertour.com/PDF/2005/Ecotec_22L.pdf >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia. >> >> (still undecided on engine conversion choice!) >> >> http://web.mac.com/tubaneil >> >> Jonce Fancher 56 Single Cab 66 Sunroof Bug 66 Variant Squareback 66 Porsche 912 71 Sunroof Bus 84 Vanagon "Gottfried" 85 Vanagon Westi 2003 10 Passenger Sprinter Fancher's Upholstery Inc. - www.fanchers.com Not-A-VW Club- http://mywebpages.comcast.net/jaransont3/notavwclub/
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »