

| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Decisions, decisions which conversion was: Upon seeing Bostig's handiwork |
| From: | Benny boy |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:34:19 -0400 |
"""I've got a line on a 2.5 with 49,000 miles on it in Oregon....""" That is a lot... :-) How about one with 856 miles, or 1267 miles, or 5603 miles or 8560 miles.... Move est my friend. Ben On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:05:36 -0700, Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM> wrote: >I'll second Dylan's modern nomination. > >Hans or John, its time you let Bostig document your 2.5 litre Subie >install. > >Its time to walk the walk, to put your money where your mouth is, to uh >stand up and be counted, to ask not what your country can do for your van >but what your van can do for your country, gosh darn it, its your patriotic >duty! :-) > >I can hardly wait - hurry up guys, I've got a line on a 2.5 with 49,000 >miles on it in Oregon.............. > >On 7/26/07, dylan friedman <insyncro@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> word to that! >> chassis dyno or PINKS. >> >> >> df >> >> Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM> wrote: Actually Hans, you or benny >> should finally swing by Boston so we can >> finally get real numbers for the 2.5 output for comparison on the >> dyno, the offer has been outstanding for at least a year now! Crank >> numbers from the factory are great, but as we've shown they do not >> tend to equal "as installed in a vanagon" numbers. I agree though, >> the 2.5 should have quite a bit more power than the stock zetec, not >> just edging it out.. but I would like actual confirmation of exactly >> how much so it can be compared without speculation. The 2.2L was a >> great example of this, as it turns out a base zetec will accelerate >> the same van faster than an ej22 even with it's additional .2 liters. >> Partly because of lack of scavenging effect and lost efficiency in >> cylinder filling because of the subie's boxer layout, and partly >> because it weighs 60 lbs more. I'd love to measure what the SOHC 2.5 >> subie puts down so we all know what we're talking about. >> >> Jim Akiba >> >> On 7/26/07, Hans Achter wrote: >> > Yes, either choice would be a huge improvement, and they are about the >> same >> > in ease of installation. >> > The 2.5 subaru does a lot more than 'slightly edge out' the basic Zetec, >> > it's a 165 hp engine vs 130 hp for the Zetec. >> > -Hans >> > http://www.vanaru.com >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "David Clarkson" >> > To: >> > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 9:25 AM >> > Subject: Fwd: Decisions, decisions which conversion was: Upon seeing >> > Bostig's handiwork >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Dvdclarksn@aol.com >> > > To: easywind1975@HOTMAIL.COM >> > > Sent: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:58 pm >> > > Subject: Decisions, decisions which conversion was: Upon seeing >> Bostig's >> > > handiwork >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I really have been impressed with Ben's testimonials of the Subaru >> > > conversion and now looking at Bostig Engineering's homepage I am >> equally >> > > impressed with the Zetech conversion. My Westfalia was rebuilt (very >> well >> > > I might add by The Bug Shop in Blacksburg, Va.) at 178,000 miles and >> now >> > > is approaching 250k. I must be realistic and realize that while it's >> > > running well that it probably can't be rebuilt to the same standards >> again >> > > and that either of the afore mentioned conversions would be a huge >> > > improvement. It seems that the 2.5 Subaru engine would slightly edge >> out >> > > the most basic Zetech in horsepower. Both have OBD II functions and >> > > probably get fairly close mileage. The Subaru would also be a bit more >> > > affordable. The Zetech does offer more niceties and?features that are >> an >> > > improvement that would provide safeguards for the engine and increased >> > > reliability in?what would be a?breakdown situation. So bottom line is >> > > which engine would be?the best investment for reliability and value? >> Has >> > > anyone on the list owned and driven both of these in the same or >> > > comparable vehicles???Is the Subaru an easier conversion as it would >> > > appear? Any informed opinions out there? I hope that this decision >> is?a >> > > ways off for me but I feel that I will attempt an install of one of >> these >> > > two options. Thanks to all who respond. >> > > >> > > ? >> > > >> > > David Clarkson >> > > >> > > 90 Westfalia (not a traitor to the brand-just a realist with a desire >> to >> > > keep my vehicle on the road) >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ________________________________________________________________________ >> > > AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's >> free >> > > from AOL at AOL.com. >> > > >> > >> > > > >-- >Jake >1984 Vanagon GL >1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" >www.crescentbeachguitar.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »