

| Subject: | Re: Power output of actual vans? (long) |
| From: | Jake de Villiers |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:59:46 -0700 |
Nice work Frank - its a pleasure to listen to your reasoned and knowledgeable lectures. :-) On 7/28/07, Frank Grunthaner <FrankGRUN@aol.com> wrote: > > In a message dated 7/28/07 11:05:21 AM, syncrolist@bostig.com writes: > > > > Ha I liked your reply Frank. Excellent. We have multiple dyno charts all > > taken from the same chassis dyno for a vanaru 2.2, tiico HO, 2 wbxers, 4 > > different zetecs, 1 supercharged zetec, and coming soon e85 naturally > aspirated > > zetec, and e85 supercharged zetec.. as well as the upcoming turbo > kit(the entire > > exhaust tract is now complete) Having all this info from the same dyno > is > > quite nice, and really the only way to do it. As Mark points out, it is > the > > "complete" inforamtion that is really required. BTW Frank, Clint(a > listmemeber > > and solidworks guru) is helping us model the vanagon so we can put it > into a > > CFD virtual wind tunnel... my intention is to build a collaspable > colluder > > cone (see through on top) to see how much fuel efficiency we can gain at > cruise > > with a simple strap on cone of reasonable size that is easy to produce > and > > inexpensive. I think given the low pressure area we always drag around > behind > > us, it may be a substantial improvement. > > > > Jim Akiba > > > > > > Jim, > > Egad a reply to one of my rants! Exciting! I fully agree that results from > the same dyno with the same operator seriously increase the quality of the > data > but more importantly the reality factor inherent in its comparative > interpretation. For some time my son and I were developing a Solidworks > based model of > the Westfalia to tighten up the drag issues. Our power numbers come to > second > difference velocity curves taken at the Pomona International Dragway (when > unoccupied by paying nutsos). We were also looking at FemLab for a far > more > detailed treatment. > > In the course of these experiments, two areas showed enough promise to > warrant some measurements. We looked at the rear drag profile and > undercarriage > sealing. For the rear drag issue, we modeled pressure zone profiles and > put > together three plastic hemi-balloons and taped then to the rear. I have to > go back > to my notes at the time but we reduced drag by 12 to 18%. In one test, the > number was 33% but it couldn't be duplicated. (In the spirit of some > tuners, I > should have used this for an SAE paper). The upshot of this was that I got > pulled > over (we were testing at night on the Palmdale highway) by the CHP and got > ticketed for occluded rear vision. Went to the court to fight the ticket. > Had a > full sheaf of papers. The judge listened attentively (!). He remarked that > when younger he had had a bay window bus that just blew all over the road > and > asked if such mods would have any effect on stability. I offered that it > was in > the relm of possibility. I them looked around the courtroom to see blank > stares > for a mass of humanity that that must have thought I came from area 51. > Finally the judge stopped the discussion, announced that this was the > singularly > most unusual anti-ticket response he ever heard, congratulated me for > originality and dismissed the ticket with a warning about frightening > other drivers at > night. > > The point here relates to the fundamental flaw. The rear balloon worked, > we > had an idea for speed related inflation, etc, etc, but no answer for rear > vision. Practicality --- zip, but fun. > > The second idea worked well and is a real solution. The open underside of > the > vanagon is a real drag component. We got a set of thin 0.0625 inch Al > sheet > stock and enclosed (frame rail to frame rail) and basically covered the > underside from the front to the transmission. We added louvered slots for > the > radiator air flow, left the spare tire cover operable and stayed away from > suspension > components. Big decrease in drag - minimum 8% max 15%. 15% came when we > added > the Diesel sound box cover. Serviceability was a problem. The system has > been > removed as I complete the front to back dual muffler system for the TDi > and > the diesel fired heater. No temperature measurements, but we provide for > air > inlets at front by gas tank and at egress at the rear. Work in progress. > > Frank Grunthaner > > > > > ************************************** > Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at > http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour > -- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" www.crescentbeachguitar.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »