

| Subject: | Re: Power output of actual vans? (long) |
| From: | Jake de Villiers |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:31:45 -0700 |
I think it is the same as the Euro version California that Whittaker posted recently. No real luggage rack, more of a fairing for the closed top. On 7/28/07, Scott Daniel - Shazam <scottdaniel@turbovans.com> wrote: > > That fuel mileage is excellent for a gasoline vanagon ! > I faired the top of my westy roof rack over smooth. > Haven't noticed anything, but I also don't drive it as my daily driver > either, or much anyway. > > I think I saw, somewhere, maybe this is what you did, or what a euro westy > has..... > They just smoothed it in a fairly straight line from the front of the roof > to where the pop top forward edge is. No attempt to retain a front roof > rack. > > Is that what you did ? > Scott > www.turbovans.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > John Reddick > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 4:54 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Power output of actual vans? (long) > > I have always thought the front fiberglass portion of the Westy was > responsible for a lot of drag/wind noise. Passenger vans are far quiter, > and get 2 mpg better mileage on the highway. I finally got around to > finishing my modified front section. I saw a genuine European Westy with > one. It must have been available at some point there. I also saw some > wind > tunnel results for Vanagons. .44 for the stock van, .50 for the Westy, > with > the front really throwing up turbulent air all the way from the front. > I drove about 1000 miles to the High Country Bus campout. > Unfortunately, > due to some really bad traffic jams, I don't have any good numbers for MPG > improvements. I was hoping for 8% at 65 mph, with better results at higher > speeds. It is definitely getting better mileage, but I can't verify how > much. I can't verify the noise either, as it was 90+ degrees and I was > driving with the windows down. > Hopefully the drive home will allow for better results with less > traffic/wind effects. > The worse mileage I got was 25.8 MPG, which includes almost 2 hours > in > a jam in Raleigh due to an accident. Other than that, there was minimal > wind. that was on a 311 mile run from souther NC. I kept the speed at > 65-70 > the rest of the time. > Ir really like the idea of closing off the bottom of the van. Cheap > and easy, and might also reduce road noise. > > John > 87 Westy 2wd MT > .70 4th > 2002 EJ25 Subaru > -- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" www.crescentbeachguitar.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »