

| Subject: | Re: My ultimate section, but, 1.9 or 2.1 |
| From: | Jeff Lincoln |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:35:06 -0500 |
I haven't driven my 1.9 in about a year (coolant pipes rusted through) however I like mine too. I've never had any issues with it. On 8/16/07, Joseph Fortino <fortino1@earthlink.net> wrote: > > I like my 1.9l for now.. simple and clean > > peace all, > Joe > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Ben <huotb@VIDEOTRON.CA> > >Sent: Aug 16, 2007 8:45 AM > >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > >Subject: Re: My ultimate section, but, 1.9 or 2.1 > > > >I don't agree on the 2.1L FI an coolant system being better. But that is > me! > > > >Ben > > > >Scott Daniel - Shazam wrote: > > > >>Fwiw, > >>I think only 2.1's are worth bothering with, for a stock water-cooled > gas > >>vanagon engine anyway. > >>Those 1.9's wbxr's....no offense, but .....guess I worked on too many of > >>them. > >>For my own 85 I put in a whole 2.1 engine and fuel system......the 2.1is > >>better.......not a whole leap better, but a little more power, a little > more > >>sophisticated engine management system. Slightly easier to work on, > 'maybe' > >>. Do the 2.1. > >>Scott > >>www.turbovans.com > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf > Of > >>Benny boy > >>Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 6:38 PM > >>To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > >>Subject: My ultimate section, but, 1.9 or 2.1 > >> > >>Lately, slowly, for the past month, i have been working on what i would > call > >>my "utimate web section" (on my site), this section will almost be a > mini > >>web-site, about 5 to 9 page of pitures & explanation, of course, for > those > >>who know me it won't be about tires :-) This will not be my final > section > >>but close to it, i have done a lot for those vans and i will take that > >>smooth for the next year starting with my trip to Mexico next December. > >> > >>And of course, it will be about the engine: > >>-How to prepare yourself (mentally and physically) > >>-Which tools > >>-how to drain coolant > >>-how to remove the engine > >>-how to clean the engine > >>-how to put the engine in pieces > >>-how to analyse parts and their conditions > >>-how to clean and prep parts > >>-how to put the engine back together (it will be a top-end, pistons and > >>heads) > >>-how to put back the engine IN > >>-how to bleed van and break the new engine. > >> > >>I already have most pictures, but not all, many are missing. > >>So to my question: i would like to know if i should use a 1.9L or a 2.1L > ? > >>(mostly 2.1L for now!!!) > >> > >>If a poll would be possible i would do one but it's not, so, i thought > that > >>listee could post here what they have. > >> > >>Next Sunday, i'm doing a very ugly and oily 87, i will start taking the > >>missing pictures, but! next week, after that engine, i'm going in Nova > >>Scotia to install a Vanaru 2.5L near Halifax, but after that, i'm doing > an > >>ugly and sick 1.9L... > >> > >>And as those engine are so similar, i don't want to do 1 section for > each > >>engine. One will be enough. > >> > >>So i'm just curious, is there more 1.9L owner? or 2.1L > >> > >>Best regards, Ben > >>http://www.benplace.com/vw2.htm > >>ps.: By then, my girlfriend will be done with here thesis, so we will do > >>something else than working on computer. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- Thanks, Jeff 90' Carat (Grover) 86' (We call this one Parts) 85' GL (Preparing for reanimation)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »