

| Subject: | Re: Some ride height and suspension observations.. |
| From: | Bill Glenn |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Sep 2007 17:01:45 -0400 |
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 11:53:16 -0700, Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM> wrote: >Just to point out Bill that you have the diff and axles up front but you've >got the gas and tank over the rear wheels now. >There is also a weight difference between the 2WD double wishbone front >suspension and the Syncro's MacPherson strut system. > >I don't think its really useful to compare your Syncroweight distribution to >Don's 2WD GL. > >You shouldn't be having traction issues anyway! :) Jake, Just to be clear, I was not trying to compare my Syncro's weight distribution to Don's. I purposely did not quote any of his post or refer to his van, or to his experience with it. Rather, in response to your statement about a front-weight bias in Vanagons, which did not distinguish between 2WD and 4WD, I replied to, and quoted a portion of your post in an attempt to broaden the discussion by providing actual data, as opposed to anecdotal evidence, since it seems very few have actually weighed their vans. I made sure to say I was talking Syncro. I went on to relate my experience with 2WD Vanagons, and with my Syncro in 2WD mode, i.e. the prop shaft removed. I again made no reference to anyone else's van, just my own experience. Rather than us speculating as to how a Syncro compares with a 2WD Vanagon in weight distribution, perhaps someone who has actually weighed their 2WD Vanagon will post to this thread. I'm sorry if you feel that my comments were off-topic or otherwise misplaced. Cheers, Bill
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »