

| Subject: | Re: 50 worst cars, and the vanagon isn't one of them |
| From: | Joy Hecht |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:40:11 -0400 |
Actually, I'd guess vanagons aren't on the list because if we thought they were that bad, we wouldn't have them! And I'd hardly call an average of 18-20 mpg decent gas mileage, unless your comparison is a hummer. Yeah, Wes, you are blinded by love. But that's okay, we all are! Joy :::-----Original Message----- :::From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf :::Of Wesley Pegden :::Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 6:01 PM :::To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM :::Subject: Re: 50 worst cars, and the vanagon isn't one of them ::: :::People keep bringing up how vanagons aren't on this list. I mean, of :::course they're not, right? :::The major design flaw of the vanagons is the head gaskets, and still :::many go 100k or even 200k between gasket jobs. Other than that, many :::aspects of the vanagon seem very well designed. It's an incredibly :::functional vehicle, whether comfortably hauling 7 passengers or camping :::equipment, that gets relatively good gas mileage (decent even by today's :::standards), and is relatively easy for a backyard mechanic to work on. :::Did I mention it looks cool? ::: :::It seems most of the rest of its quirky mechanical reputation is due to :::its rarity and novelty in this country (especially away from the west :::coast)... your typical mechanic hasn't seen one before, and so has no :::experience with them, making owning one a major pain if you can't do the :::work yourself or are lucky enough to live next to a good vanagon :::mechanic. ::: :::Am I missing something here? ::: :::These are old vehicles. Of course they need some parts replaced. And :::since there aren't many vanagons around, it's harder to find mechanics :::who can do the work. ::: :::Am I just blinded by love?
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »