

| Subject: | Re: 1968 in print and TV ads |
| From: | Jeffrey Lubin |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:57:23 -0400 |
OK, so, even if it IS a '72 bus, it's still definitely '68 people in and around it! Richards, Andrew wrote: > A '68 bus? Too bad the advert has what looks to be a '72 in their > picture! > > > > Andrew > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:47:16 -0400 > > From: Jeffrey Lubin <visionwizard@VERIZON.NET> > > Subject: Re: 1968 in print and TV ads > > > > Cool. > > You can find it online with the following link: > > http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/03/business/media/03adco.html?ref=todaysp > aper > > > > > > Ian Steele wrote: > > >> Todays NY Times (Section C, page 8) describes new TV and print >> > > >> advertisements for Bank of America. One (reproduced in small print) >> > > >> features a 1968 bus with the caption "The most valuable car in his >> > > >> collection isn't the Italian roadster or LeMans racer or the British >> > > >> Limousine, but a 1968 bus". >> > > > > >> These advertisements are meant to appeal to investors with upwards of >> > > >> 3 million dollars to invest - a situation that surely fits most of us >> > > >> with vintage buses! >> > > > > >> Ian Steele >> > > >> 83.5 >> > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »