

| Subject: | Re: regarding the ad campaign for banks (there is a lie in it ... ?) |
| From: | mike |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:51:46 -0700 |
Must be Fryday someplace, I laughed. Pretty good. Mike On 10/3/07 11:36 AM, "Roger Whittaker" <rogerwhitt1@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > Dear Arthur Sulzberger Jr., Chairman & Publisher: > > In a story by LYNNLEY BROWNING covering a banks attempt to reach customers > http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/03/business/media/03adco.html?_r=1&ref=todayspa > per&oref=slogin > there is a line indicating the bus pictured is a ' 68 ... > i belong to a VW van users group... V > anagon.com whose members are knowledgeable about all things Bus / VAN ... > > The scuttlebutt around the users is that the van pictured is really a 72 > > comments range from ... > If you look carefully, however, the bus appears to be a '72-it's got the > larger tail lights. (name1) > to ... > Hey, the guy has $3,000,000. He built a time machine, went back to 1968 and > convinced VW to make a 1 off '68 that had '72 modifications. (name 2) > and ... > Nah, it's just typical of the world today, sloppy work and no attention to > detail. If they wanted a '68 bus for the ad, they aren't that hard to find! > (name3) > > It is none of my concern but i suggest if you want the customer (bank) to > have creditability in their ad program > they may want to employ a technical expert along with an advert agency. > > thank you for your consideration > yours > > -- > roger whittaker (1-604-414-6266) > There are two kinds of jobs in the world: > Picking up garbage and telling people things. > Successful people do both, with the same good attitude. (riw) > ----------------------------------------------------------- > View the growing list of video work at: > http://one.revver.com/watch/376349 > http://one.revver.com/watch/357909/qt/affiliate/10 > http://one.revver.com/watch/345572/qt > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7135104650374818257 > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3259745150182742364
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »