

| Subject: | Re: Mobil I ... negative..(from digest) |
| From: | Mike S |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:56:32 -0400 |
At 01:07 PM 10/4/2007, Don Hanson wrote... >928 Mailing list...Rennlist... One member undertook to document the >type of >oil being used at the time of these engine failures, and by far the >most >common oil was Mobil One synthetic..To me, that indicates Mobil One >was >perhaps the least effective lubricant...Most failures=Least >effective... Coincidence is not causality. Did that member also tally the oil used in all non-failed engines which participated in the same events? I'd hazard to guess that Mobil 1 may be the most commonly used oil by performance enthusiasts, and so he might have found it to be the most common oil in non-failed engines, too. Given the procedure, I'd bet he could also conclude that engine failure is the result of a car being driven by a white male. >So yes, almost all of the 928 motor failures were proven to be >lubrication-related. The failure scenario you described is the result of a problem with the design of the lubrication system, and does not implicate the oil itself.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »