

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon Re-power cheap and reliable...Reply from digest |
| From: | neil N |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:29:46 -0700 |
Thanks for info! I would go with either Digi 1 or 2 at this point. Am finding that *good* donor cars are going fast..... for some reason. Maybe I'll end up at a "dismantler". Cheers, Neil. On 10/29/07, pdooley <psdooley@verizon.net> wrote: > Main advantage is Digi2 is readily available and dirt cheap. > > From what I hear Digi1 is available in 2 different flavors- apparently was > used on CA cars and on the Corrado G60. > The G60 Digi1 is speed density with no MAF sensor. It is a decent setup for > forced induction. > The CA Digi1, who knows? I don't live in CA. > > Basically Digi2 is the best choice, it gets the job done, is a factory > setup, works pretty well and cheap/available. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > neil N > Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 10:27 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Vanagon Re-power cheap and reliable...Reply from digest > > Is there any advantage to Digifant 2 as opposed to Digifant 1 ? > > TIA, > > Neil. > > On 10/28/07, pdooley <psdooley@verizon.net> wrote: > > I4 VW is the easiest swap, especially with a Diesel donor van. > > > > The Golf/Jetta digi2 EFI can be wired by anyone with average skills and a > > Bentley manual. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > > Jake de Villiers > > Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 2:39 PM > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > Subject: Re: Vanagon Re-power cheap and reliable...Reply from digest > > > > Not to be argumentative Don, but I don't think you're qualified to speak > on > > how easy that motor was to install and mate to the van, electrically or > > otherwise. It was already done, right? > > > > Sounds like it works well in your van, for sure. > > > > On 10/28/07, Don Hanson <dhanson@gorge.net> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > Saw a post outlining alternatives for replacement motors. It 'opined' > > > that an inline four was a pretty good value and I will second that from > my > > > personal experience. I didn't do the transplant in my 84 vanagon with > the > > > 92 Cabriolet motor, and I am not very much of an authority on everything > > > Vanagon, so this is a newbie opinion, but from a newbie who's driven the > > > crap outta his Vanagon for just over a year. > > > It looks to me like the van I got may originally have been a deisel. > It > > > has a 5 speed with a very low (but useful on rough or steep) first gear > > > that I use only occasionally. It may have had some of the gearing > > > changed, > > > because the ratios seem about right for the 1.8 liter gasoline motor > that > > > now lives in there. > > > .There is a small notch that had to be cut into the engine compartment > > > below the lid on the driver's side to clearance the intake, and the > > > exhaust > > > system was welded after the end of the manifold flange in a crude > manner. > > > The intake from the stock Vanagon air cleaner is made from large > aluminum > > > sprinkler pipe, but it works fine and the whole beastie has been > > > remarkably > > > dependable and inexpensive to drive. > > > I gained about 12 hp (estimated, using results documented by others > with > > > the same hardware) by changing a camshaft for $120 and I plan on > changing > > > to > > > an aftermarket exhaust header system said to be worth another 10-12% hp > > > increase..~$320 for that..So that should up the Bently specified 94hp of > > > the > > > little 1.8 liter motor to a whopping 115 or so. Anyhow, no speed demon > > > but > > > adequate to keep me rolling ahead of most traffic most of the time. > > > I see the 1.8 liter 8 valve motor (like mine) for around $300 long > > > block, > > > very often. Add the $450 for the easy mods mentioned above and you have > > > the > > > "motive lump" to install for under a grand. Find an old blown up diesel > > > vanagon and you have a cheap and easy pretty nice ride. > > > I'd guess the stock little 4 banger Rabbit motor is similar in Hp to > a > > > WBX motor, but they are certainly cheaper to run and rebuild..If I had a > > > blown up WBX motor in a van, I doubt I'd rebuild that one, but would > > > probably go the inline gas motor route myself. > > > I am not advocating this particular combo to everyone, just passing on > > > that it seems to work fine for me..All you Subie guys, don't get all > > > huffy, > > > I am not saying your conversion is not the best...I am just saying the > > > inline 4 vw gas motors seem to be cheap, common and easy to install and > > > they > > > work fine in vans, too. > > > Don Hanson > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jake > > 1984 Vanagon GL > > 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" > > www.crescentbeachguitar.com > > http://subyjake.googlepages.com/ > > > > > -- > Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia - > "Jaco" (Bustorius) > > http://web.mac.com/tubaneil > > -- Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia - "Jaco" (Bustorius) http://web.mac.com/tubaneil
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »