

| Subject: | Re: That "peppy" 2.2L |
| From: | Jake de Villiers |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:59:26 -0700 |
That doesn't look too far off Jim. Having carried both, I'd say that the Subie is at least 25 lbs heavier than a WBX, but probably not 50 lbs heavier. On 10/30/07, Jim Akiba <syncrolist@bostig.com> wrote: > > I can't find anything definitive on the subject. Seems like it > somewhere from 250-300. Here's a pic of one on a bathroom scale at 250 > though ha not sure how accurate that'll be, but there doesn't seem to > be much else other than people speculating on nasioc. > > http://tinyurl.com/yvylh2 > > Jim Akiba > > On 10/30/07, Jim Akiba <syncrolist@bostig.com> wrote: > > hmmm, that doesn't sound right, that would make it only around 20 lbs > > heavier than a wbx yeah? Where did you get that number? > > > > Jim Akiba > > > > On 10/30/07, Bob Stevens <mtbiker62@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > "Glad to hear about the lightening the load and raising the rev > limiter > > > taking care of business with the 2.2. Be what does th 2.5 SOHC > > > fully dressed weigh?" > > > > > > I'm not the expert on this Jim, but believe it's in the 250 lb. > range. > > > > > > bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > Windows Live Hotmail and Microsoft Office Outlook � together at last. > Get it > > > now! > > > -- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" www.crescentbeachguitar.com http://subyjake.googlepages.com/
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »