

| Subject: | Re: That "peppy" 2.2L |
| From: | Benny boy |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:29:53 -0400 |
This morning... oupsss, afternoon (too many beers and Scotch yesterday), i'm putting VW boxer engine in the garbage for the metal guys, sad end i have to say but i need room in the shop and those are rust bucket and very high milage engine, so, since this morning we are lifting engine... to make room for Subi's 2.5L.... So, a fully loaded 2.1L (AC, PS) is heavy, about the same as a loaded 2.2L, me, i would say that the 2.2L feel lighter? Now, the 2.5L, it's heavier, a good 50 pounds at least.. maybe more. Cheers, Ben On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:29:04 -0600, Bob Stevens <mtbiker62@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote: >Jim, >I was surfing the conversion links Monday and found the comparisons, two motors sitting side by side, the "boxer" weighing 240 and Subie 2.2 250 (don't "think" the 2.5 is going to weigh more just due to its HP increase mods). I'm almost certain it was on Ben Huot's site, but returning there I can't find it? So, stumped! ;>) In the end, I was using someone's else's reported numbers, not a techy report as reference. > >Bob >'87 Syncro Westy .... with a fresh 2.2 inside and almost out the shop door.> > I can't find anything definitive on the subject. Seems like it> somewhere from 250-300. Here's a pic of one on a bathroom scale at 250> though ha not sure how accurate that'll be, but there doesn't seem to> be much else other than people speculating on nasioc.> > http://tinyurl.com/yvylh2> > Jim Akiba> > On 10/30/07, Jim Akiba <syncrolist@bostig.com> wrote:> > hmmm, that doesn't sound right, that would make it only around 20 lbs> > heavier than a wbx yeah? Where did you get that number?> >> > Jim Akiba >_________________________________________________________________ >Peek-a-boo FREE Tricks & Treats for You! >http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »