

| Subject: | Re: That recent post bashing Tiico..one on Yahoo subaru too. |
| From: | Kim Brennan |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Nov 2007 01:45:04 -0400 |
Different world in the east. 75 mph is tops in most places, and 65-70 is more standard. I recently took I-70 from DC to Chicago and the turnpikes back to DC. If I cranked it up to 80mph I was passing everything in sight. Most of the time I kept it around 70 mph (slightly faster than most of the rest of the traffic). After all I was pulling a trailer... Same was true on I-81 north to Canada and on the highways between Toronto and Quebec City. Less lanes, less people (paradoxically) and slower speeds than Southern California. I remember taking the 15 from San Diego up to San Bernadino and nearly getting run over for "only" doing 75mph. I stayed in the rightmost lane and was passed by everything. On the other paw, driving in the Seattle area, I was nearly pulled over by a cop when I was doing 58 mph in a 55 zone. He followed me for about 3 miles, before pulling off and turning around to look for other prey. In Tacoma/Seattle, anybody doing more than 60 mph stands out like a sore thumb. On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:25 AM, Scott Daniel - Shazam wrote: > I just drove that the other day in a fast car. > I remembered powering up those hills in my 1.9TD vanagon ....which > did ok. > I will say, it's another world when hills are not even an issue. > > And I'm thinking of maybe getting a diesel vanagon going here for a > veggy > oil system, but only for in town. Not for long distance, or high > speeds or > big hills. Just for rattling around town at very low cost. > > In California, the whole Bay area to Tahoe, and all points > south....typical > driving is 3 or more lanes, all packed with cars, going 80, and > even faster. > 90 easily at times. Ideally you need a car that will go up any hill > in the > state at 85 mph, with AC on, if you want to be 'current' with the > driving > conditions there. Lots of places like that actually......actual > speeds on > many interstates these days are a solid 80 and above, including > uphill. > Fun ! > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On > Behalf Of > mike > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 10:01 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: That recent post bashing Tiico..one on Yahoo subaru too. > > Depends on the Freeway and the hill, try it on I 80 up Donner Pass > > > On 11/1/07 6:51 PM, "Mike" <mbucchino@CHARTER.NET> wrote: > >> My stock,original, low miles, '87 Westy has 2.1 and an >> automatic. It >> doesn't perform as poorly as you say yours does. I guess your >> engine must >> be very tired, and is obviously lacking power, if it can't even >> maintain > 45 >> mph up a long freeway hill. It sounds like it's time for a >> rebuild.......talk to Boston Bob for the real answers to your >> problems. >> >> Mike B. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Scott Daniel - Shazam" <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM> >> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 9:15 PM >> Subject: Re: That recent post bashing Tiico..one on Yahoo subaru too. >> >> >> Stock waterboxers....yup, can be real reliable. >> Seriously lacking in decent power in many situations however... >> Like my 85 weekender with 2.1 wbxr engine and fuel system, and auto >> trans.... >> The best it can do on some freeway hills is 45 and sometimes even >> only >> 40..... >> And all the other ( too numerous in California ) cars are going >> 70 or 80 > up >> that same hill. Like it's a safety issue even. >> You combine that with the joke head gasket system, and old tech >> engine >> management system, and fuel mileage that could be better...... >> and lots > of >> things are hard to work on too, on stock waterboxer engines, like >> a water >> pump job with the engine in the van - a pure knuckle ripper of a job. >> Consider all that, and the search for a better engine becomes >> obvious. >> Scott >> www.turbovans.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On >> Behalf Of >> Zeitgeist >> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 5:14 PM >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >> Subject: Re: That recent post bashing Tiico..one on Yahoo subaru too. >> >> My WBX is too damn reliable. I feel cheated of my shot at vocal >> malcontentedness. My old '87 GL was too reliable, as well. I >> feel doubly >> cheated. My anger and remorse is palpable. >> >> Just thought I'd share my story of woe and misery with my factory >> conversion... >> >> On 11/1/07, Rob <becida@comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>> That made your day didn't it? >>> >>> Rob >>>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »