

| Subject: | Re: 85 Vanagon - Clutch throw-out level moverment ? |
| From: | neil N |
| Date: | Sat, 1 Dec 2007 18:12:13 -0800 |
I recall seeing something about this on the list a while back (last summer?) IIRC, there was speculation as to whether or not a return spring should have been designed/installed at the factory. Personally I don't know why there isn't one. It seems to me that there is great potential for premature throw out bearing wear. Neil. On Dec 1, 2007 5:46 PM, AAG - Larry Word <word_aag@comcast.net> wrote: > Tonight, in the middle of bleeding my new master cyl./slave cylinders, it > dawned on me that I don't understand something about these van's I've always > taken for granted - without some sort of "return spring" for the throwout > level (on the bellhousing), what makes the slave cylinder return to its > original "upright" position? > > Is it simply the clutch pressure plate? If so, why do other car manual > transmissions/clutch have a return type spring on their system? > > Thanks for group's insight - I'm always amazed by the good answers I > receive from the Vanagon community. > > Thanks > > Larry > Ga. > -- Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia - "Jaco" (Bustorius) http://web.mac.com/tubaneil Engine swap beginings: http://musomuso.googlepages.com/home
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »