

| Subject: | Re: Municipal camper bans |
| From: | VW Doka |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:50:06 -0800 |
In our neck of the woods, the ban is only on vehicles greater than 20' in length. This helps to prevent people from parking thier toy hauler trailers on the street for months. Cheers, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf Of -------- Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 10:31 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Municipal camper bans This is a very common regulation, in many townships, etc. I live in one, but its not quit the same. Our law reads, your not allowed to park an RV or commercial vehicle on the street, or in the front (yard) of your home, even on your own property. The side or back of your home is OK. I'm all for it. Otherwise, in this place I live, some people would be parking 100 FT RV's everywhere.... until they get repossessed. Geza Polony wrote: >Folks, > >Have any of you ever dealt with this kind of a problem? My city, Oakland, >CA, is very seriously considering a ban on camper parking within the city >limits, apparently following the lead of Santa Barbara and other places. >This ban would include Vanagon Campmobiles such as the type owned by yours >truly. Obviously, I'm concerned. > >Does anyone have experience with this kind of thing? Can cities of this size >get away with such ordinances, which would prohibit even non-city residents >from parking their RV's, etc., for even a few minutes on city streets? > >The first offense is $250; the second, towing. It would apply even to a >Vanagon Weekender without a poptop, as long as it has anything inside >intended for camping (per Calif. vehicle code.) > >If this passes, I can't keep my Westy. Is that unbelievable or what? > >If you have any interest in it, read Chip Johnson's article in the SF Chronicle. > >Geza > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »