

| Subject: | Re: Municipal camper bans |
| From: | Kim Brennan |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:34:17 -0500 |
Sheesh. Makes me happy to be in Virginia, where I can park my Vanagons in my driveway, or lawn or on the street and not get hassled. Of course, the neighbor requested that I not leave my trailer in front of HIS house, and being neighborly, I complied. But I wasn't legally required to do so. Of course, if I park on the street, the car has to have its personal property tax kept up to date and have legal tags. If I park on my driveway (private property) I don't have to have legal tags. On Dec 11, 2007, at 2:15 PM, David Kao wrote: > I am in San Jose, California. This city has had something in civil > code > like that too. But the code disallows parking of RV on the street > longer than 72 hours. If it is a trailer then it is not allowed on > the drive way either. > > I have a Vanagon GL and a Westy. I looked at the registration paper > from DMV there is nothing on the Westy's paper that is different from > the paper for the GL. It says nothing about RV, camper, etc. In fact > it is just like my Passat. I don't think if I somehow someday park > my Westy in Oakland the cops can legally tell from the license plate > that it is a RV. You can argue that it is a car, a van, and you pay > no less registration fee and do no fewer smog checks. He, he, LOL. > > David > > --- Geza Polony <gezapolony@SBCGLOBAL.NET> wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> Have any of you ever dealt with this kind of a problem? My city, >> Oakland, >> CA, is very seriously considering a ban on camper parking within >> the city >> limits, apparently following the lead of Santa Barbara and other >> places. >> This ban would include Vanagon Campmobiles such as the type owned >> by yours >> truly. Obviously, I'm concerned. >> >> Does anyone have experience with this kind of thing? Can cities of >> this size >> get away with such ordinances, which would prohibit even non-city >> residents >> from parking their RV's, etc., for even a few minutes on city >> streets? >> >> The first offense is $250; the second, towing. It would apply even >> to a >> Vanagon Weekender without a poptop, as long as it has anything inside >> intended for camping (per Calif. vehicle code.) >> >> If this passes, I can't keep my Westy. Is that unbelievable or what? >> >> If you have any interest in it, read Chip Johnson's article in the >> SF Chronicle. >> >> Geza >> > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http:// > mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »