

| Subject: | Re: headlights on with ignition on! |
| From: | Geza Polony |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:09:25 -0500 |
Shawn, Yes, but that's what makes this site so cool. There are plenty of automotive sites that limit participation strictly to mechanical issues, but how much fun are they? I think of this site like a bar, a la Cheers, where everybody happens to have a Vanagon and sits around shooting the bull about it, and if the discussion happens to veer off into salt water fuels or urban legends or international politics, there's always a friendly moderator to whack us on the collective head. Personally I like the off-topic stuff, the tangents, the barbs and all the rest. Give me an IPA, a pool cue, and let's talk about that fuel pump buzzing... Geza On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:11:32 -0500, robert feller <syncro.carboncow@GMAIL.COM> wrote: >Man this list takes the word tangent to a new level! > >How did we get from me inquiring about an obvious hack I can disable to >headlights consuming .25mpg and killing the ozone? jeesh! > >Shawn > >On Dec 14, 2007 7:49 PM, tom ring <taring@taring.org> wrote: > >> On 14 Dec 2007 at 17:32, Scott Daniel - Shazam wrote: >> >> > >> > All good thoughts. Re the safety or not factor, and fuel consumption. >> > In some states it's technically illegal to drive with just >> parking/running >> > lights on, I believe. >> > I wouldn't do it for the attention it might attract from cops. >> >> Interesting. I've had it set up that way for 5 years and driven through >> about >> 15 states on a regular basis. No problems so far. I think it might be >> one of >> those things that police would only use as an excuse if they had no other >> reason to pull you over and wanted to. And now there so many vehicles >> with >> DRLs, you are probably pretty much psychologically invisible to them. >> Even if >> you got pulled over it's probably a very cheap ticket or just a warning. >> I >> could justifiably say that they used to work and now don't for some >> reason. ;) >> >> tom >> K0TAR >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf >> Of >> > tom ring >> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 4:13 PM >> > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >> > Subject: Re: headlights on with ignition on! >> > >> > Yes, DRLs (Daytime Running Lights) can be argued to be a bit safer than >> not >> > having them. There is also a lot of evidence that they do nothing or >> almost >> > nothing. They definately use millions of gallons of extra fuel per year >> > from >> > the .25 to .5 mpg hit. And makes that much extra CO2. You are free to >> > choose >> > your poison, at least in the US. >> > >> > Here's a place that tells how to shut them down on many vehicles. I did >> it >> > on >> > my 96 Jetta. It turned off the headlights, but not the running lights, >> > which >> > seems to be a good compromise to me, especially since it's less likely >> to >> > leave >> > me with a burned out headlight at night, which is most definitely a >> safety >> > hazard. >> > >> > http://www.lightsout.org/disable.html >> > >> > The only VW van mentioned is 2000-2002 Eurovan. >> > >> > tom >> > K0TAR >> > >> > On 14 Dec 2007 at 16:29, robert feller wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ----------------------------------------- >> > Tom Ring K0TAR, ex-WA2PHW EN34hx >> > 85 Westphalia GL Albert >> > 96 Jetta GL The Intimidator >> > taring@taring.org >> > >> > What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic >> > simulations >> > involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory frog, we can assume it >> > will >> > be pretty bad. >> > - Dave Barry >> > ----------------------------------------- >> > >> > >> > > > >-- >Shawn Feller >Ohio >www.carboncow.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »