

| Subject: | Re: Air mass meters Go Westy |
| From: | John Bange |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:57:31 -0800 |
On Dec 23, 2007 12:03 PM, Jim Akiba <syncrolist@bostig.com> wrote: > If you are asking which air metering system type is better.. both map > based and maf based have their pros/cons... but generally speaking MAF > systems are more accurate, and map usually considered easier to setup > and tune.. but I don't really find that the case. > Ya, I figured as much. Of course then the question is whether the relatively aged contraption that is the Wasserboxer-Digifant stands to gain much by the extra significant digits you get from a MAF sensor. I was just curious whether the job of adapting a MAP reading to the Digifant is easier or harder than the MAF. A MAP sensor sure would be easier to attach on the mechanical side, and a barometric sensor is certainly cheap. -- John Bange '90 Vanagon - "Geldsauger"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »