

| Subject: | Re: What are my best PC GPS options? |
| From: | Mike Miller |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:49:56 -0800 |
A techie type told me that Magellan was top rated. $200 at Costco. Voice and screen directions and touch screen input. When I have $200.... Mike On 1/16/08 10:41 AM, "Roger Whittaker" <rogerwhitt1@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > dear all > we are using goole maps on the macbookpro > some limitations to be sure ... > recently while being towed the driver used is gps to locate a place we were > going to > i asked him what version he had ... Garmin ... he said and .... very happy > used to be he had tom tom and he said it was useless .. > always limited always arriving at the wrong location ... > lots of wrong directions ... > then he said the kicker ... > when he arrives with misinformation from garmin he emails them and tells > them so ... > has received free upgrades in 3 month blocks for sometime into the future > ... > for offering them the much coveted update corrected information ... > > we we likely get a garmin (which seems to be a boaters most preferred as > well) > yours > > On Jan 16, 2008 7:58 AM, Doug Alcock <doug.alcock@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I had a Garmin handheld GPS (which was stolen) --- it would work with a >> laptop but I didn't like the cumbersomeness (if that is indeed a word) of >> the arrangement. And the display on the GPS unit itself was way too small >> for my aging eyes. >> >> My stepson recently bought a TomTom One for his car --- I've borrowed it a >> number of times and I'm sold. They're about $250 Cdn --- nice big screen >> that I can read while driving and a really good touchscreen interface that >> is also usable while driving. Coverage and accuracy is good --- I have >> both >> found and been navigated to some pretty obscure addresses and locations. >> And >> it is sooo much more convenient than messing around with a laptop. >> >> Don't know for sure about the backroads coverage but my experience with >> the >> TomTom is that if you can find the road on a map it's going to be in the >> TomTom. May not apply to the backroads of BC --- but worth checking into. >> My >> experience with the logging/backroads of BC when I lived there is that I >> could find them on a map and they had names/designations --- which >> suggests >> to me that they'd be in the TomTom. YMMV of course........... >> >> Cheers, >> Doug >> Mississauga, Ontario, Canada >> >> >> On 1/15/08, Loren Busch <starwagen@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm glad to hear that Delorme has improved the coverage in Canada. The >>> issue Dave was trying to address is coverage in more remote areas, >>> specifically he was asking about the interior of BC. Here in the States >> I >>> didn't have any complaints about the coverage on the Delorme. But on a >>> trip >>> two years ago I ran the laptop most every day for three weeks. I >>> alternated >>> between Streets & Trips and Delorme software. And I'll stick to my >>> opinion >>> that the Delorme software sucks, a really bad user interface for any >>> searching or planning. I found it very frustrating and ended up using >>> only >>> Streets & Trips for the last week of the trip. But, given that, I found >>> both >>> very poor for use in town. Both got lost and gave wrong directions when >>> driving in traffic if the signal was lost for a few seconds. If you >>> pulled >>> up to a stop light neither could figure out what direction you were >> going >>> when standing still and started providing directions that were all >> wrong. >>> In a severe test, getting to a friends place in Kennsington, Ca. (next >> to >>> Berkley) I'd still be driving in circles if I hadn't known where I was >>> going. Summing up so far, unless you have a second person on board to >> act >>> as navigator the laptop based systems fall far short. Dedicated units >>> meant >>> for use in vehicles seem to be a much better solution. BUT, those tend >> to >>> lack the detailed coverage in the boonies, are set up for urban >>> navigation. >>> BTW, to any reading this, I'm all ears for any better solutions that >> have >>> been found. My experience is limited at this point. >>> >>> On Jan 15, 2008 11:48 AM, Mike Collum <collum@verizon.net> wrote: >>> >>>> I don't know what year the DeLorme software you tried was from but the >>>> 2008 version has greatly increased Canadian coverage. I used the 2008 >>>> Street Atlas Plus and even the small streets (and phone numbers) in >>>> Almonte as well as Head of St. Margaret's Bay and Halifax were shown. >>>> Apparently, all of Canada is shown that way but those places are where >> I >>>> really used it. The version I had before that only showed "most" of >>>> Canada's main highways. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.dougalcock.com >> > > > > -- > roger w > There are two kinds of jobs in the world: > Picking up garbage and telling people things. > Successful people do both, with the same good attitude. (riw) > ----------------------------------------------------------- > View the growing list of video work at: > http://revver.com/find/video/?query=LastonLastof&search_on=owners > and ... older work at > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7135104650374818257 > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3259745150182742364
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »