

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon 1.9 Cat on Jetta 2.0 engine? |
| From: | neil N |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:14:55 -0700 |
Thanks Jake et al. Turns out the whole parts scavenging was a bust. The spare front lower grill had a broken tang at the bottom and the cat and exhaust looked pretty iffy. The van was pretty much gone through by the time I got there. Pretty sure my '81 isn't technically required to have a cat. Just trying to be nicer to the oxygen we breath by installing one. Cheers, Neil. On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Neil, most Subaru conversions use the original cat and muffler assembly > very successfully. > > Both the 2.2 and 2.5 litre motors use them , the 2.2 even passes California > smog testing. > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Roger Sisler <ROGERSISLER2000@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > > > I used a 1.9 catalytic converter on my 93 Fox. Works fine, is the same > > part number, and passed emissions. It looks rather high mileage. > > > > > > -- > Jake > 1984 Vanagon GL > 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" > Crescent Beach, BC > www.crescentbeachguitar.com > http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27 > -- Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia - "Jaco" http://web.mac.com/tubaneil http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »