It'll be just fine, especially if it's an OE type and not some small hokey
aftermarket el cheapo cat.

I use various cats here and there making Subaru exhaust systems and so
forth.

I wouldn't expect the slightest problem.

And.....BTW - I believe that a hollowed out cat does not flow as properly
as a cat with good catalyst material in it.
    If you know what principle an expansion chamber on a two-stroke engine
works by, you might wonder about the dynamics of pressure waves in a
hollowed  out cat, and how it might not be right.  The entire system, from
air intake onward, to the tail pipe, was engineered to have a cat in there.

I always run a good cat.

Btw, the chances of back yard 'creativity' - taking short cuts, leaving
things off, and thus having less than what you optimally hoped for - are
pretty good.      . If you don't REALLY know what you are doing - stay very
close to stock and that's how you get the best results.

Scott

www.turbovans.com <http://www.turbovans.com/>

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
neil N
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 8:58 AM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Vanagon 1.9 Cat on Jetta 2.0 engine?

Hi all.

Going to harvest a few things from an '85 Vanagon. I assume it has a 1.9.

If the cat looks ok, could i use it on a Jetta 2.0 engine?

I imagine that since the displacement is larger, then no. But if yes,

then I can save a few bucks.....

....... especially since I'd be installing a cat voluntarily.

(AFAIK, up here an '81 air cooled doesn't require it. Pretty sure no

one would notice if I didn't have it. Just trying to run cleaner)

Thanks much for any input.

Neil.

--

Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia - "Jaco"

http://web.mac.com/tubaneil

http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/

--

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG.

Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1329 - Release Date: 3/14/2008
12:33 PM