

| Subject: | Re: clutch time |
| From: | Mike Collum |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:12:38 -0400 |
Having all the right tools and facilities is indeed nice, but I dropped my tranny and replaced the clutch, unassisted I might add, in my hardpack gravel driveway using jackstands all around. I didn't think it was all that tough of a job. I used a couple of roll around jacks in the process. Oh, I did put platforms under each jackstand so they wouldn't sink in. Mike VW Doka wrote: > I'm with Ben on this one and I'd bet 99% of professional mechanics would > agree that having a lift is better than not. > > Additionally, every method Scott listed below is easier to do with a lift. > You want it a couple of feet of the ground... raise the lift a couple of > feet of the ground. You want to use a floor jack for the tranny... lower > the van and use the floor jack. > > Jack stands suck! They always seem to get in the way. For most, they are a > necessity, but definitely, not as efficient as a lift. > > Cheers, > > Jeff > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf > Of Scott Daniel - Shazam > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:36 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: clutch time > > > Hi, > > Isn't that funny. I don't consider it arguing at all, and I think 'lively > debate' is wonderful and healthy. > > And - I'll tell you all the things 'wrong' with working on a lift. > > > > One, your arms get very tired holding them above your head while standing. > Some professionals that do this 25 years, 25 hours a weak, suffer from > conditions similar to carpal tunnel and /or numbness. I find about 8 time > easier to lay on my back on a creeper, or even a piece of cardboard, and > reach up to things that are just a couple of feet above me. > > > > Two - every time you need undo something 'up there' ..and granted there > won't be much of that in a vanagon - but then, you have to either lower the > car back down, or get out a step ladder to undo that thing up there you > forgot. > > Three - you need a special transmission jack,a stall one, to deal with the > trans 6 feet up in the air. When the bottom of the van is only about 2 feet > from the ground it is so much easier to deal with - you can almost > 'drop-fudge' it the ground in that short distance. A floor jack is just > fine even for lowering it. > > > > I've had a shop with a lift. I had one for 50 dollars a month rent once, > with a working hydraulic lift. I have no need for a lift at all. > > You look at how race cars are built - which since I do a lot of conversion > and 'building' work, I tend to see it as building up a chassis sometimes - > cars like that start out getting built on a table even, and typically a race > car is supported a couple feet off the ground - that way you can work on the > sides, the top, and the bottom. Plus it's safer overall to not have it way > up in the air. Plus you don't need that much ceiling height above the > vehicle. > > > > I raise the whole van equally front and rear. It's more natural to have it > sitting level. One 'mistake' I see back yard type techs make is not > providing good access to what they are trying to work on. > > You need a flat level smooth hard floor, and a roof over it at least, and > 4 solid jack stands. Truck size ones, not little dinky car ones. And the > ractething type too- not the pin in a hole type..nice big solid mutha, and > TWO floor jacks. > > Then you can do anything pretty much. Lower engines and transmissions and > so forth. How did I ever get by without a cherry picker for 4 decades !!? - > I use overhead lifting from supported beams, for front engine cars, or even > an old fashioned tripod made from trees- though that's much more an outdoor > back year thing. > but 4 very decent floor stands and ideally two floor jacks - works just > great. Safer and more convenient overall. > > For people that do a LOT of transmission pulling, I can understand a lift, > and the last time I used one - same deal, had to climb up a step ladder and > reach in over the fender to undo something from the top. > > And holding my arms above my head a lot while standing - no thank you. > 'taint healthy. > > Scott > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Benny boy > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 7:59 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: clutch time > > > > Hi Brendan, i don't want to argue with Scott but if you don't have a lift, > > and i guess you don'T, it's not that fun and easy to do that on the ground! > > > > It is possible to do so but by raising the front! Then, lowering the trany > > and pull this one foward. > > > > Buy the SASCH kit, nothing else. Believe me, i have tried many. > > > > Now, i agrre with Scott, you DON'T want a lighter flywheel on a stock Boxer > > engine. > > > > Cheers, Ben > > http://www.benplace.com/ > > > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:39:47 -0700, Brendan Slevin <totorovan@GMAIL.COM> > wrote: > > > >> I know I should've done it when I had the engine out in September but. . . > > >> I think I may need to replace Totoro's clutch in the next couple months. I > >> felt, for the second time in a couple months, the clutch slip after > shifting > >> into second on a moderate hill. I am wondering what the best kit is and > >> also, can the replacement happen with out removing the engine entirely? Any > >> tips are greatly appreciated. Are there lightened flywheels out there for > >> the 1.9 engine? > > >> Brendan > >> 84 GL Totoro > >> Bend, OR > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.0/1342 - Release Date: 3/25/2008 > 10:26 AM >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »