

| Subject: | Re: this has me rethinking dexcool |
| From: | Angus Gordon |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:59:07 -0700 |
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:55 AM, gary hradek <hradek@yahoo.com> wrote: > http://www.girardgibbs.com/dexcool.html > Don't forget this is lawyer talk, not a technical paper of any sort. GM had a problem with coolant leakage through the intake manifold on these engines, and I'm guessing the lawyers probably sued the makers of Dex-cool, GM, the gasket manufacturer and the Detroit water department. The shotgun approach to litigation seems quite lucrative. I have a friend with a Buick Century which had this problem a few years back. I checked it over for him after it had overheated and found coolant in the engine oil. Some research on the internet revealed the most likely cause was this coolant leak through the intake manifold. GM had a new, re-designed gasket available so I, unsuspecting, offered to change it for him. I mean, how much work is an intake manifold gasket? Ten hours later I knew! GM in their infinite wisdom runs coolant from one head bank to the other through the intake, which sits down in the V between the heads. Makes the waterboxer design with all it's external plumbing look like the work of a genius. I think the problem is with the design and gasket material, not the coolant. The "rusty sludge" they talk about in the lawsuit is no doubt the result of coolant left unchanged since the vehicle was new. Vanagon content - since working on this Buick I have never again cursed the myriad of external pipes and hoses VW adorned the Vanagon with. Even the waterboxer head gaskets are a brilliant design in comparison! -- Angus Gordon birdworks@gmail.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »