

| Subject: | Re: Trim replies when referancing post |
| From: | Tom Buese |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:48:08 -0600 |
On Apr 2, 2008, at 3:37 PM, Scott Daniel - Shazam wrote: > They have my condolences then. Yep, it makes it a PITA to reply, & that list is a fraction of what it used to be. Mr. BZ > If it's a matter of not using up too many megabytes or bogging down > the > system with too many repeated words and writing that way, that I > understand. > But to see a reply to 'who knows what' .............quite silly. > Doesn't' > help communication. I think that gets lost her online sometimes- > actual > 'commitment to Communication' with a capital C. > Very terribly so. > If the Foundling Fathers were as lazy and careless as witnessed on the > internet commonly these days, we'd never get anywhere with the > Declaration > of Independence or The Constitution. It's SO NICE when words are > used like > they really matter. > Sincerely > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Buese [mailto:tombuese@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:29 PM > To: Scott Daniel - Shazam > Cc: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Trim replies when referancing post > > The vintage bus list will not even let you post if you have not > substantially edited the reply to cut out non relevant text. > > FWIW, > > Mr. BZ > > On Apr 2, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Scott Daniel - Shazam wrote: > >> On the other hand, it's pretty weird reading someone's reply to >> something >> and you can't tell what they are replying to. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On >> Behalf Of >> MKeller >> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:20 PM >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >> Subject: Trim replies when referancing post >> >> Hello all, >> Could we limit our replies to just the pertanent excerpts? This is >> sop; >> lately the amount of repetion has equalled or exceeded the content >> of new >> postings. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Mark keller >> >> Email on the go, sent by TELUS >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG. >> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.4/1355 - Release Date: >> 4/1/2008 >> 5:37 PM > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.4/1355 - Release Date: > 4/1/2008 > 5:37 PM > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »