

| Subject: | Re: less than one? |
| From: | craig cowan |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:53:56 -0400 |
I personally think having one or more, or wanting one (or more) is one thing, but i see the wierdest of the wierd and the most passionate of the passionate, to be those with "MOST OF ONE". I think many of us have been here.....owning "MOST OF ONE" (Something crucial missing at the time). Try explaining that one to people! "Oh you have a Vanagon!?" "Well...... Yes, technically. It needs an engine, transmission, etc etc etc, but yes, i have one, and i love it" "Oh...." (Eyes roll and they walk away) -Craig '85GL (Well, most of one.) On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Maggie Dew <wildebus@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm . . . I was going to say one is enough, but maybe even thinking of > buying one, lusting after one, plotting how to get one - all would qualify > you. > > Maggie > > >I just bought a second Vanagon. How many before I'm officially > > considered a "Vanagon Weirdo"? > > > > -- > > John Bange > > '90 Vanagon - "Geldsauger" > > '90 Vanagon GL- "Weasel" >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »