

| Subject: | Re: 2.1 Engine Exhaust Stud/Bolt Questions? |
| From: | Scott Daniel - Shazam |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:33:36 -0700 |
My preference would be to have all studs. The advantage is it's always easy to heat a nut to remove it years later, from the stud, rather than risk breaking a bolt off that's screwed deep into the head. Yes, this could make some operations more difficult, like if you just wanted to loosen the exhaust pipes and push them back a bit to 'sneak' out one head to replace the head gasket, engine in the van- then yes, that would be harder, but I think it's worth it to have studs. As for the push rod lower covers, having to remove a whole bolt to get those brackets undone is silly. I just notch out the brackets with a hack saw, so you only have to loosen a bolt or nut to get those covers off. Scott www.turbovans.com -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Philip Zimmerman Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 1:22 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: 2.1 Engine Exhaust Stud/Bolt Questions? Time for some preventative maintenance on the proverbial rusting exhaust system! Presently running a stock 2.1 exhaust system with OEM Pipes and Hangers. Anyone using 8-M8x38mm studs on the block verses the more common, 4-Studs & 4-M8x30mm Bolts used in the stock configuration? I'm concerned about interference issues. I do understand the (OEM) Bolt/Stud set-up is for ease of installation and all. Installing either the front/rear pipes onto four fixed studs, may be a real pain, let alone a near-impossible set-up to work with, given the tight spaces in this region of the engine compartment. What are your experiences? Rusting in Campbell River, BC..... regards Phil Z. --------------------- -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1375 - Release Date: 4/12/2008 11:32 AM
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »