

| Subject: | Re: Cat / O2 Sensor Removal |
| From: | neil N |
| Date: | Mon, 5 May 2008 10:04:48 -0700 |
I agree. A properly working cat/O2 sensor etc., will help reduce emissions.
Based upon my Westys model year, ('81 air cooled in Canada), I'm not
required to have a cat. But I'll be installing one with the Jetta
engine conversion I'm doing.
Neil.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Jake de Villiers
<crescentbeachguitar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Keep it, and keep your cat too; your grandkids ( and mine) will thank you
> for it.
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Matt Drew <t3vanagon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I had a feeling that the catalytic converter was bad (broken, bouncing
> > pieces of ceramic have a very distinct sound), but what I was not
> > expecting
> > (and should have been, given that this is after-all a Vanagon) was that
> > the
> > rear O2 sensor was in need of replacement.
> >
> > So bottom line...
> >
> > I have been going back and forth on whether or not to completely bypass
> > both
> > of them.
> >
> > I've known of people who've had their cats completely removed and had the
> > resulting missing section replaced by a simple connecting pipe (in one
> > case,
> > glass).
> >
>
>
> --
> Jake
> 1984 Vanagon GL
> 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie"
> Crescent Beach, BC
> www.crescentbeachguitar.com
> http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27
>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »